Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+\/QRP\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+\/QRP\s*$/: 20 ]

Total 20 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] /QRP (score: 1): Author: luther@mail.mdt.net.au (Martin Luther); Date: Mon Mar 25 23:57:51 2002; One thing that I find a number of times is I copy ???@@@^RP. Sort of like the end of a long call. So I try the RP go ahead. No response. QRZ.!... &**%%%$$$#QRP. Aha think I, "the QRP go ahead". SHHHH; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-03/msg00471.html (7,525 bytes)
2. [CQ-Contest] /QRP (score: 1): Author: "PY2NY - Vitor" <py2ny@arrl.net>; Date: Mon, 13 Dec 2004 23:55:25 -0200; Fast and quick... Used QRP to call stations at ARRL 10m last week end. With some guys, was the only way to be listened and worked. Was an incredible challenge to me but worth every effort... Thanks e; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-12/msg00495.html (7,133 bytes)
3. Re: [CQ-Contest] /QRP (score: 1): Author: "Dale L Martin" <kg5u@hal-pc.org>; Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2004 08:44:26 -0600; On Mon, 13 Dec 2004 23:55:25 -0200 "PY2NY - Vitor" <py2ny@arrl.net> wrote: Fast and quick... Used QRP to call stations at ARRL 10m last week end. With some guys, was the only way to be listened and w; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-12/msg00525.html (8,853 bytes)
4. Re: [CQ-Contest] /QRP (score: 1): Author: "Kelly Taylor" <ve4xt@mts.net>; Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2004 22:12:13 -0600; KG5U launched this into the ether: And don't forget confusing the heck out of operators who don't have Q5 copy on you and think there's actually something they need to log behind the slash. Just say; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-12/msg00557.html (7,320 bytes)
5. [CQ-Contest] /QRP (score: 1): Author: "Tom Osborne" <w7why@verizon.net>; Date: Mon, 16 Aug 2010 13:08:13 -0700; BlankDuring this weekend's WAE, I tuned on a station that had called CQ and a K9 station was answering him. The K9 had /QRP tagged to the end of his call. I didn't want to call over him so I just wai; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-08/msg00136.html (6,789 bytes)
6. Re: [CQ-Contest] /QRP (score: 1): Author: David Gilbert <xdavid@cis-broadband.com>; Date: Mon, 16 Aug 2010 13:52:02 -0700; Some probably think that it will give them special preference in a pileup. Some probably think that it helps to validate their QSO as being made with 5 watts or less. Some probably think that the oth; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-08/msg00137.html (7,133 bytes)
7. [CQ-Contest] /QRP (score: 1): Author: kr2q@optimum.net; Date: Mon, 16 Aug 2010 23:27:14 +0000 (GMT); Well gosh...I can't resist this one. Actually, I'll only share a little story (anecdote). About a million years ago, on 20 SSB, there was this famous guy named FRED from Thailand. He was running a bi; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-08/msg00139.html (7,615 bytes)
8. Re: [CQ-Contest] /QRP (score: 1): Author: "KU7Y" <ku7y.cw@gmail.com>; Date: Mon, 16 Aug 2010 19:41:31 -0600; Let me throw something else out here..... First, I agree with not using /qrp when calling a station..... nothing but a time waster IMHO. Same holds true for DX pileups! But... when I would be running; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-08/msg00140.html (7,923 bytes)
9. Re: [CQ-Contest] /QRP (score: 1): Author: Mike Fatchett <mike@mallardcove.com>; Date: Mon, 16 Aug 2010 20:43:12 -0600; Or they hear QRP and say hmmm looks like a great frequency to steal ???!!! W0MU _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesti; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-08/msg00141.html (8,526 bytes)
10. Re: [CQ-Contest] /QRP (score: 1): Author: "KU7Y" <ku7y.cw@gmail.com>; Date: Mon, 16 Aug 2010 21:10:34 -0600; I think all QRPers understand that they are not going to hold a prime run frequency very long! And it sure doesn't make sense to try and fight for it either! :-) But when you do get lucky and hold a; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-08/msg00142.html (8,103 bytes)
11. Re: [CQ-Contest] /QRP (score: 1): Author: "Mike DeChristopher" <mike@n0hi.net>; Date: Tue, 17 Aug 2010 08:29:29 -0400; The thought a few years ago was that the DX would hear QRP and take mercy. That seems to have faded some. Really, it just adds extra time to the call and makes it tougher to copy. Nobody cares how mu; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-08/msg00147.html (8,951 bytes)
12. Re: [CQ-Contest] /QRP (score: 1): Author: "Radio K0HB" <kzerohb@gmail.com>; Date: Tue, 17 Aug 2010 12:46:21 -0800; I think they expect you to give them a sympathy-Q 73, de Hans, K0HB -- "Just a boy and his radio" -- Proud Member of: A1 Operators - http://www.arrl.org/a-1-op MWA - http://www.W0AA.org TCDXA - http:; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-08/msg00150.html (8,583 bytes)
13. Re: [CQ-Contest] /QRP (score: 1): Author: Steve Sacco NN4X <nn4x@embarqmail.com>; Date: Tue, 17 Aug 2010 16:40:43 -0400; The year was 1988. The date: CQWW Phone, 00:00Z. I was in my own home in the flatlands of Somerset, NJ, having moved from my parent's place high on a hillside with an awesome shot to EU, AF, and SA i; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-08/msg00152.html (10,072 bytes)
14. Re: [CQ-Contest] /QRP (score: 1): Author: Barry <w2up@comcast.net>; Date: Tue, 17 Aug 2010 16:07:15 -0600; I've always thought the guy COPYING the QRP station should get extra points... Barry W2UP -- Barry Kutner, W2UP Lakewood, CO _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-08/msg00153.html (9,552 bytes)
15. Re: [CQ-Contest] /QRP (score: 1): Author: Dale Putnam <daleputnam@hotmail.com>; Date: Tue, 17 Aug 2010 18:37:44 -0600; You're right on Steve, add the occasional time that you find a pair of good qrp ops, like KR2Q and another like him, K4BAI, say, and have the two of them running... qrp... a bit apart... one of the b; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-08/msg00154.html (12,019 bytes)
16. Re: [CQ-Contest] /QRP (score: 1): Author: "KU7Y" <ku7y.cw@gmail.com>; Date: Tue, 17 Aug 2010 18:43:00 -0600; I have always said that the only reason I ever got a fair score was because of all the nice folks who took the time to dig me out of the mud! Many thanks to you all..... and I hope to give many of y; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-08/msg00155.html (8,470 bytes)
17. Re: [CQ-Contest] /QRP (score: 1): Author: Gary <k7zd@qwest.net>; Date: Tue, 17 Aug 2010 18:59:50 -0700; Ron, I echo your comment! Last year I killed myself running 5W in a 'test.. but the real gents were the ones who patiently took care to copy my call.. the UBN showed I had 6 mis-copy me (they had to; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-08/msg00156.html (9,498 bytes)
18. Re: [CQ-Contest] /QRP (score: 1): Author: Tom Haavisto <kamham69@gmail.com>; Date: Tue, 17 Aug 2010 22:22:14 -0400; I sat in the the QRP forum at Dayton this year during a time-slot when there was no contesting related forums going on that I was interested in. I very much enjoyed a comment that was made during the; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-08/msg00157.html (9,766 bytes)
19. Re: [CQ-Contest] /QRP (score: 1): Author: Doug Smith <dougw9wi@gmail.com>; Date: Tue, 17 Aug 2010 22:18:31 -0500; IMHO, unfortunately, sometimes signing /QRP works. (TX) > CQ TEST W9YT (RX S9+20)< VE3CX (RX S9+20)< K7ZD (RX S9+20)< KU7Y (RX S7) < W9WI/QRP If the first three HP stations all clobber each other, wh; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-08/msg00158.html (8,685 bytes)
20. Re: [CQ-Contest] /QRP (score: 1): Author: RT Clay <rt_clay@bellsouth.net>; Date: Wed, 18 Aug 2010 06:17:51 -0700 (PDT); In about the same time taken to send "/QRP", you could have sent your whole call again, which would be much more useful. Tor N4OGW/5 _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-08/msg00162.html (9,332 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1]