Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+\[Bulk\]\s+Re\:\s+Q\-Signals\s+for\s+Contesting\s*$/: 5 ]

Total 5 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [CQ-Contest] [Bulk] Re: Q-Signals for Contesting (score: 1)
Author: "V. Sidarau" <vs_otw@rogers.com>
Date: Tue, 12 May 2015 09:21:30 -0400
For whatever reason some people still want to see a Q code message while there is a well established RST report system. Now: 1. If there is a new (NEW, unfamiliar yet) Q-code message, who would prope
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-05/msg00329.html (11,625 bytes)

2. Re: [CQ-Contest] [Bulk] Re: Q-Signals for Contesting (score: 1)
Author: Joe <nss@mwt.net>
Date: Tue, 12 May 2015 15:26:13 -0500
Vlad how about a signal SSB so processed it's barely understandable? Sig The Original Rolling Ball Clock Idle Tyme Idle-Tyme.com http://www.idle-tyme.com On 5/12/2015 8:21 AM, V. Sidarau wrote: For w
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-05/msg00343.html (12,357 bytes)

3. Re: [CQ-Contest] [Bulk] Re: Q-Signals for Contesting (score: 1)
Author: RT Clay <rt_clay@bellsouth.net>
Date: Wed, 13 May 2015 14:43:53 +0000 (UTC)
Obviously you give them more than "5" on the "readability" rating to indicate they "turned the processing knob to 11" 59 = perfect audio69 = slight over-processing, some syllables lost 99 = loud but
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-05/msg00355.html (9,262 bytes)

4. Re: [CQ-Contest] [Bulk] Re: Q-Signals for Contesting (score: 1)
Author: Zack Widup <w9sz.zack@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 13 May 2015 11:16:02 -0500
Actually, I would think that the "Readability" number would go less than 5 if you couldn't "read" them. Maybe a "39" or a "29" for a signal report. 73, Zack W9SZ _____________________________________
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-05/msg00357.html (10,006 bytes)

5. Re: [CQ-Contest] [Bulk] Re: Q-Signals for Contesting (score: 1)
Author: K8MR via CQ-Contest <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Date: Wed, 13 May 2015 15:36:42 -0400
Once again, the problem is not generally that one cannot read the bad signal, especially on CW. The problem is that you can read them somewhere (like a Khz away) that you should not be able to read t
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-05/msg00366.html (11,439 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu