Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+\[OhQP\-mail\]\s+Ohio\s+QSO\s+Party\s+and\s+CT\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+\[OhQP\-mail\]\s+Ohio\s+QSO\s+Party\s+and\s+CT\s*$/: 1 ]

Total 1 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [CQ-Contest] [OhQP-mail] Ohio QSO Party and CT (score: 1): Author: David Pruett <k8cc@comcast.net>; Date: Sat, 22 Aug 2009 01:04:01 -0400; Just keep in mind that CQP does not count county multipliers between in-state stations, but rather these contacts are scored as the state (CA in CQP). I suspect that CT, kludged in the way Jim descri; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-08/msg00353.html (9,761 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 1
Page: [1]