Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+\[PVRC\]\s+A\s+DX\s+Contest\s+on\s+the\s+WARC\s+bands\s+\-\-\s+A\s+terrible\s+idea\s*$/: 11 ]

Total 11 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [CQ-Contest] [PVRC] A DX Contest on the WARC bands -- A terrible idea (score: 1)
Author: Tim Shoppa <tshoppa@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2021 13:14:00 -0400
Frank, is it as simple that they made the mistake in calling it a "Contest"? If they called it an "Activity tracker" or "QSO Party" would that have been better? The ARRL encouraged activity on all ba
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2021-08/msg00187.html (9,467 bytes)

2. Re: [CQ-Contest] [PVRC] A DX Contest on the WARC bands -- A terrible idea (score: 1)
Author: John Geiger <af5cc2@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2021 13:32:04 -0500
It is really no different than CQ magazine's DX Marathon other than it only runs a month and does sum DX entities from each band together, but one could argue that the DX Marathon is just as much of
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2021-08/msg00190.html (11,610 bytes)

3. Re: [CQ-Contest] [PVRC] A DX Contest on the WARC bands -- A terrible idea (score: 1)
Author: donovanf@erols.com
Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2021 15:10:20 -0400 (EDT)
Much the their credit, the SEDXC updated their contest rules for what will hopefully be a very popular DX contest. https://t-rexsoftware.com/sedxc/100_watts_and_a_wire/index.htm 73 Frank W3LPL -- Ori
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2021-08/msg00193.html (11,906 bytes)

4. Re: [CQ-Contest] [PVRC] A DX Contest on the WARC bands -- A terrible idea (score: 1)
Author: donovanf@erols.com
Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2021 17:49:29 -0400 (EDT)
Hi Tim, Much to their credit, SEDXA changed their September DX Contest rules https://t-rexsoftware.com/sedxc/100_watts_and_a_wire/index.htm to fully comply with the long established ARRL recommendati
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2021-08/msg00199.html (11,158 bytes)

5. Re: [CQ-Contest] [PVRC] A DX Contest on the WARC bands -- A terrible idea (score: 1)
Author: Ron Notarius W3WN via CQ-Contest <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2021 23:09:16 +0000 (UTC)
Tim, IMHO, there's a big difference between an "operating activity" that has, at most, a relative handful of stations on the WARC bands... such as a DXpedition or two, or at most, 1 or 2 W1AW/# stati
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2021-08/msg00201.html (13,706 bytes)

6. Re: [CQ-Contest] [PVRC] A DX Contest on the WARC bands -- A terrible idea (score: 1)
Author: Ben Coleman NJ8J <nj8j@benshome.net>
Date: Sun, 5 Sep 2021 00:39:07 -0400
Much the their credit, the SEDXC updated their contest rules for what will hopefully be a very popular DX contest. It might be good to notice that this is strictly a local event: -- Who: Licensed SE
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2021-09/msg00008.html (7,904 bytes)

7. Re: [CQ-Contest] [PVRC] A DX Contest on the WARC bands -- A terrible idea (score: 1)
Author: Stan Zawrotny <k4sbz.stan@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 5 Sep 2021 10:25:44 -0400
Any suggestions as to how they can keep their radio transmissions from leaving their "local " area and being heard by non-participants? __________ Stan, K4SBZ _______________________________________
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2021-09/msg00011.html (8,878 bytes)

8. Re: [CQ-Contest] [PVRC] A DX Contest on the WARC bands -- A terrible idea (score: 1)
Author: AB1J via CQ-Contest <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Date: Wed, 8 Sep 2021 20:05:34 +0000 (UTC)
Has anyone noticed the uptick in activity on the bands due to the SEDXC 100w/wire operating event? There was an extreme overreaction to this event.  All the HF bands are underutilized and in need of
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2021-09/msg00027.html (9,164 bytes)

9. Re: [CQ-Contest] [PVRC] A DX Contest on the WARC bands -- A terrible idea (score: 1)
Author: Ron Notarius W3WN via CQ-Contest <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Date: Wed, 8 Sep 2021 19:48:32 -0400
Im all for more activity on all the bands. But this operating event was initially promoted as a contest. Contesting... formal, organized, sponsored contests.. due not belong on the WARC bands, at the
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2021-09/msg00028.html (11,219 bytes)

10. Re: [CQ-Contest] [PVRC] A DX Contest on the WARC bands -- A terrible idea (score: 1)
Author: AB1J via CQ-Contest <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Date: Thu, 9 Sep 2021 02:27:46 +0000 (UTC)
Calling it a contest and allowing the WARC bands was a forgivable error.  All it would have taken is one authoritative figure (like W3LPL) to suggest privately to the SEDXC to change it from "contest
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2021-09/msg00030.html (11,834 bytes)

11. Re: [CQ-Contest] [PVRC] A DX Contest on the WARC bands -- A terrible idea (score: 1)
Author: Henry Pollock - K4TMC <kilo4tmc@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 9 Sep 2021 09:22:18 -0400
I am looking forward to the March/April 2022 issue of NCJ in which we can read the definitive article titled "When is a 'Contest' a Contest" by AP1RIL... 73 & High Rates, Henry - K4TMC ______________
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2021-09/msg00032.html (11,848 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu