Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+\[cwops\]\s+\[PVRC\]\s+WPX\s+CW\s+Signal\s+Quality\s+Concerns\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+\[cwops\]\s+\[PVRC\]\s+WPX\s+CW\s+Signal\s+Quality\s+Concerns\s*$/: 1 ]

Total 1 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [CQ-Contest] [cwops] [PVRC] WPX CW Signal Quality Concerns (score: 1): Author: donovanf@starpower.net; Date: Sat, 6 Jun 2020 16:25:56 -0400 (EDT); Hi Art, Those of us who aren't pleased with the many new clicky transceivers now on the market might decide to vote with our feet and go elsewhere if a contest sponsor eliminates signal reports from; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2020-06/msg00132.html (13,806 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 1
Page: [1]