Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+\[wrtc2014\]\s+WRTC\-2014\s+Selection\s+Areas\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+\[wrtc2014\]\s+WRTC\-2014\s+Selection\s+Areas\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [CQ-Contest] [wrtc2014] WRTC-2014 Selection Areas (score: 1): Author: k1to@aol.com; Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2013 12:50:08 -0400 (EDT); Thanks, Martin. While the Assisted categories continue to gain in popularity, the point-and-shoot skill is not what WRTC seeks to emphasize. Yes, there is cheating out there. Unfortunately, rabid com; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-10/msg00088.html (14,094 bytes)
2. Re: [CQ-Contest] [wrtc2014] WRTC-2014 Selection Areas (score: 1): Author: "Martin , LU5DX" <lu5dx@lucg.com.ar>; Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2013 22:25:59 -0200; Hi Dan. I really don't want to generate controversy at this time, considering things are the way they are and it certainly is not going to change. But anyways, and hopefully it may keep improving for; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-10/msg00092.html (20,129 bytes)
3. Re: [CQ-Contest] [wrtc2014] WRTC-2014 Selection Areas (score: 1): Author: "Franki ON5ZO" <on5zo@telenet.be>; Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2013 08:33:25 +0200; I'd like to openly concur with the issues Martin LU5DX raises about SOAB(A) and M/x when it comes to WRTC qualification. Not that my opinion matters let alone be taken into consideration, but he shou; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-10/msg00099.html (13,308 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]