Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+1\s+pointers\s+for\s+CQWW\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+1\s+pointers\s+for\s+CQWW\s*$/: 9 ]

Total 9 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [CQ-Contest] 1 pointers for CQWW (score: 1): Author: Gary Sutcliffe <w9xt@unifiedmicro.com>; Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2005 22:44:09 -0600; I've always felt a bit embarrassed calling a US station to get the W multiplier, knowing it is usually a big gun calling CQ (thanks K9NS for the double mult on 10!) and this is just a waste of time f; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-11/msg00766.html (9,326 bytes)
2. Re: [CQ-Contest] 1 pointers for CQWW (score: 1): Author: "Kelly Taylor" <ve4xt@mts.net>; Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2005 08:03:29 -0600; Hi all, Gary's point is well taken, but I would counter that the frequencies we use are there for the good of all amateurs, not just contesters, even during a contest weekend. The casual guy just "tr; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-11/msg00784.html (11,335 bytes)
3. Re: [CQ-Contest] 1 pointers for CQWW (score: 1): Author: Zack Widup <w9sz@prairienet.org>; Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2005 08:35:11 -0600 (CST); Yep, happens every year, particularly in ARRL DX SSB on Sunday morning. It's an almost sure bet that these same USA stations I've worked to get them off the freq calling me will send me a QSL, too. S; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-11/msg00786.html (9,683 bytes)
4. Re: [CQ-Contest] 1 pointers for CQWW (score: 1): Author: "Steve.Root@culligan.com" <steve.root@culligan4water.com>; Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2005 15:10:14 +0000; I couldn't agree with you more, Kelly. 73 Steve K0SR use full of get If of of to but know can _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-11/msg00789.html (13,425 bytes)
5. Re: [CQ-Contest] 1 pointers for CQWW (score: 1): Author: W0uo@cs.com; Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2005 10:53:43 EST; Hi all: Forgive me if this sentiment has been mentioned before. If I understand NQ4I's argument, he asserts that he worked 600 zero pointers and that these QSOs diminished his capacity to work QSOs w; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-11/msg00793.html (7,256 bytes)
6. Re: [CQ-Contest] 1 pointers for CQWW (score: 1): Author: Doug Smith W9WI <w9wi@earthlink.net>; Date: 30 Nov 2005 11:13:49 -0600; Why remove them? Doesn't the log-checking software just ignore them? -- Doug Smith W9WI Pleasant View (Nashville), TN EM66 http://www.w9wi.com _______________________________________________ CQ-Conte; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-11/msg00797.html (9,369 bytes)
7. Re: [CQ-Contest] 1 pointers for CQWW (score: 1): Author: <ve4xt@mb.sympatico.ca>; Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2005 13:30:49 -0600; Removing someone from the log before submitting it is as unfair as confirming a QSO and not logging it, IMHO. They might lose their W/K/N mults and get penalized for a NIL to boot. Sorry, I just don'; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-11/msg00808.html (8,922 bytes)
8. Re: [CQ-Contest] 1 pointers for CQWW (score: 1): Author: Bill Coleman <aa4lr@arrl.net>; Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2005 21:43:53 -0500; Why remove the USA stations? This means that if those USA stations submit logs, the contest judges will find a NIL in their logs where they worked you. Furthermore, that contact might be a valid mult; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-11/msg00827.html (10,131 bytes)
9. Re: [CQ-Contest] 1 pointers for CQWW (score: 1): Author: Doug Smith W9WI <w9wi@earthlink.net>; Date: 01 Dec 2005 01:17:12 -0600; People aren't noticing that Zack said he was talking about ARRL DX, not CQ WW. Dropping the W's from his ARRL DX log isn't going to hurt anyone else's score. It does however seem like an awful lot of; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-12/msg00006.html (7,564 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 9
Page: [1]