Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+1\s+radio\s+vs\.\s+2\s+radios\s*$/: 40 ]

Total 40 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] 1 radio vs. 2 radios (score: 1)
Author: wd4ahz@gte.net (Ron Wetjen)
Date: Tue Aug 5 05:26:59 1997
Hi Gang, Sender: owner-cq-contest@contesting.com Precedence: bulk X-List-Info: http://www.contesting.com/cq-contest-faq.html X-Sponsor: W4AN, KM3T, N5KO & AD1C Been doing some thinking lately ... try
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/1997-08/msg00019.html (9,985 bytes)

2. [CQ-Contest] 1 radio vs. 2 radios (score: 1)
Author: wd4ahz@gte.net (Ron Wetjen)
Date: Tue Aug 5 05:26:59 1997
Hi Gang, Been doing some thinking lately ... trying to gauge how "competitive" my station and contest techniques are compared to others. Just when I think I'm doing "fairly" well ... I see some of th
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/1997-08/msg00021.html (9,621 bytes)

3. [CQ-Contest] 1 radio vs. 2 radios (score: 1)
Author: aa0ob@skypoint.com (Greg Fields)
Date: Tue Aug 5 19:09:26 1997
I too would like to see something in the final listings of a contest that would indicate if the contestant was using 2 radios. How about just a asterisks next to the call to indicate two radios? I'm
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/1997-08/msg00024.html (9,661 bytes)

4. [CQ-Contest] 1 radio vs. 2 radios (score: 1)
Author: TOMK5RC@aol.com (TOMK5RC@aol.com)
Date: Tue Aug 5 20:53:49 1997
I admire anyone who can effectively use two radios. It is a real competititve edge. I have a problem chewing gum and sending at the same time. On Saturday afternoon of NAQP CW, I took time to listen
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/1997-08/msg00027.html (9,299 bytes)

5. [CQ-Contest] 1 radio vs. 2 radios (score: 1)
Author: k7fr@televar.com (Gary Nieborsky)
Date: Wed Aug 6 09:38:31 1997
Ron, I don't think that 2 radio ops have a huge leg up on single radio ones especially out here in the Northwest. Other station equipment plays as big or bigger role than a second radio. I found that
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/1997-08/msg00028.html (9,061 bytes)

6. [CQ-Contest] 1 radio vs. 2 radios (score: 1)
Author: k5na@bga.com (Richard L. King)
Date: Wed Aug 6 16:51:31 1997
Tom, the peer pressure you mentioned doesn't exist unless you are willing to name the station/operator you observed. Otherwise it is just a whisper in the wind that will be ignored. How about it? Who
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/1997-08/msg00029.html (9,977 bytes)

7. [CQ-Contest] 1 radio vs. 2 radios (score: 1)
Author: k3ww@fast.net (Charles Fulp)
Date: Wed Aug 6 13:01:58 1997
............. This is VERY tricky and can become an obsession. You have to determine, at some point, what you are trying to compare and then how to do it. It is extremely difficult to find another pe
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/1997-08/msg00030.html (13,914 bytes)

8. [CQ-Contest] 1 radio vs. 2 radios (score: 1)
Author: TOMK5RC@aol.com (TOMK5RC@aol.com)
Date: Wed Aug 6 11:48:35 1997
<< But Tom, He/she still "got away with it" ... even with your post, the mystery station is still 'safe' to do it again ... and will still do it again, in the next operating event ... so nothing has
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/1997-08/msg00031.html (10,592 bytes)

9. [CQ-Contest] 1 radio vs. 2 radios (score: 1)
Author: k5na@bga.com (Richard L. King)
Date: Wed Aug 6 16:51:31 1997
Tom, the peer pressure you mentioned doesn't exist unless you are willing to name the station/operator you observed. Otherwise it is just a whisper in the wind that will be ignored. How about it? Who
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/1997-08/msg00033.html (9,978 bytes)

10. [CQ-Contest] 1 radio vs. 2 radios (score: 1)
Author: TOMK5RC@aol.com (TOMK5RC@aol.com)
Date: Wed Aug 6 11:48:35 1997
<< But Tom, He/she still "got away with it" ... even with your post, the mystery station is still 'safe' to do it again ... and will still do it again, in the next operating event ... so nothing has
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/1997-08/msg00034.html (10,596 bytes)

11. [CQ-Contest] 1 radio vs. 2 radios (score: 1)
Author: k3ww@fast.net (Charles Fulp)
Date: Wed Aug 6 13:01:58 1997
............. This is VERY tricky and can become an obsession. You have to determine, at some point, what you are trying to compare and then how to do it. It is extremely difficult to find another pe
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/1997-08/msg00035.html (13,908 bytes)

12. [CQ-Contest] 1 radio vs. 2 radios (score: 1)
Author: w4an@contesting.com (Bill Fisher - W4AN)
Date: Thu Aug 7 17:13:12 1997
N5TJ wins the NAQP with 2 radios or 1 radio. He wins because he has worked harder at learning how to operate a radio (or two) than the rest of us. Why is nobody asking for the same distiction for sta
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/1997-08/msg00037.html (9,015 bytes)

13. [CQ-Contest] 1 radio vs. 2 radios (score: 1)
Author: rocker@datasync.com (Ray Rocker)
Date: Thu Aug 7 20:18:11 1997
How, pray tell, is adding more data to the line scores -- for informational purposes only, not having any effect on one's score -- going to "diminish someone elses hard work and skill"? I haven't he
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/1997-08/msg00042.html (8,903 bytes)

14. [CQ-Contest] 1 radio vs. 2 radios (score: 1)
Author: k0wa@southwind.net (Lee Buller)
Date: Fri Aug 8 09:53:41 1997
Several random thoughts... You know, that is an interesting paragraph above. I have been trying to deal with the concept of two radios and I find it to be annoying. I guess by old brain can't separat
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/1997-08/msg00049.html (9,512 bytes)

15. [CQ-Contest] 1 radio vs. 2 radios (score: 1)
Author: wd4ahz@gte.net (Ron Wetjen)
Date: Tue Aug 5 05:26:59 1997
Hi Gang, Sender: owner-cq-contest@contesting.com Precedence: bulk X-List-Info: http://www.contesting.com/cq-contest-faq.html X-Sponsor: W4AN, KM3T, N5KO & AD1C Been doing some thinking lately ... try
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/1997-08/msg00135.html (10,136 bytes)

16. [CQ-Contest] 1 radio vs. 2 radios (score: 1)
Author: wd4ahz@gte.net (Ron Wetjen)
Date: Tue Aug 5 05:26:59 1997
Hi Gang, Been doing some thinking lately ... trying to gauge how "competitive" my station and contest techniques are compared to others. Just when I think I'm doing "fairly" well ... I see some of th
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/1997-08/msg00137.html (9,852 bytes)

17. [CQ-Contest] 1 radio vs. 2 radios (score: 1)
Author: aa0ob@skypoint.com (Greg Fields)
Date: Tue Aug 5 19:09:26 1997
I too would like to see something in the final listings of a contest that would indicate if the contestant was using 2 radios. How about just a asterisks next to the call to indicate two radios? I'm
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/1997-08/msg00139.html (9,770 bytes)

18. [CQ-Contest] 1 radio vs. 2 radios (score: 1)
Author: TOMK5RC@aol.com (TOMK5RC@aol.com)
Date: Tue Aug 5 20:53:49 1997
I admire anyone who can effectively use two radios. It is a real competititve edge. I have a problem chewing gum and sending at the same time. On Saturday afternoon of NAQP CW, I took time to listen
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/1997-08/msg00142.html (9,381 bytes)

19. [CQ-Contest] 1 radio vs. 2 radios (score: 1)
Author: k5na@bga.com (Richard L. King)
Date: Wed Aug 6 16:51:31 1997
Tom, the peer pressure you mentioned doesn't exist unless you are willing to name the station/operator you observed. Otherwise it is just a whisper in the wind that will be ignored. How about it? Who
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/1997-08/msg00143.html (9,973 bytes)

20. [CQ-Contest] 1 radio vs. 2 radios (score: 1)
Author: k3ww@fast.net (Charles Fulp)
Date: Wed Aug 6 13:01:58 1997
............. This is VERY tricky and can become an obsession. You have to determine, at some point, what you are trying to compare and then how to do it. It is extremely difficult to find another pe
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/1997-08/msg00144.html (13,911 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu