Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+1\s+station\,\s+2\s+callsigns\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+1\s+station\,\s+2\s+callsigns\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] 1 station, 2 callsigns (score: 1): Author: W2XL@aol.com (W2XL); Date: Wed Dec 10 14:05:04 1997; This is in reference to the post from W9XR about the W3GH and W9XR multi-op during the ARRL 160 Contest. If this was done from 1 station, I hope that the scores will not be submitted as other than ch; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1997-12/msg00224.html (8,738 bytes)
2. [CQ-Contest] 1 station, 2 callsigns (score: 1): Author: kn4t@gate.net (Walter Deemer); Date: Thu Dec 11 10:30:26 1997; Reminds me of when, years ago, W3GM (then W3BES) and W3EBG were single-station multi-op entries in the SS. Folks operated 40 out of 66 hours in the SS back then (over two weekends), so each station p; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1997-12/msg00244.html (8,571 bytes)
3. [CQ-Contest] 1 station, 2 callsigns (score: 1): Author: n6ig@netcom.com (Jim Pratt); Date: Thu Dec 11 11:17:05 1997; That may be well and good, but: 1) The "General Rules" are in the December QST, the 160 Meter contest announcement isn't, it was a couple of months earlier. (I don't have a stack of QSTs here to refe; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1997-12/msg00251.html (9,232 bytes)
4. [CQ-Contest] 1 station, 2 callsigns (score: 1): Author: k6ll@juno.com (David O. Hachadorian); Date: Thu Dec 11 16:25:01 1997; Reminds me of the time around 1975 when I operated CW SS under both WA6WZO and WA6WZN (husband & wife) at their house. It did wonders for the club score, and the Sunday rates were as good as Saturday; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1997-12/msg00259.html (8,649 bytes)
5. [CQ-Contest] 1 station, 2 callsigns (score: 1): Author: n5nj@worldnet.att.net (Robert Naumann); Date: Fri Dec 12 07:40:56 1997; All this discussion is missing the what I believe the intention of the rule to be which is to prevent someone "feeding calls", such as reading a page (these days a screen) from the callbook, or the c; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1997-12/msg00273.html (8,804 bytes)
6. [CQ-Contest] 1 station, 2 callsigns (score: 1): Author: tgstewart@pepco.com (tgstewart@pepco.com); Date: Fri Dec 12 10:09:30 1997; I cant agree completely, although I think some modifications could be made. If you allow one guy to use more than one call over a weekend, and he decides to work only his own club members, you open u; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1997-12/msg00274.html (10,257 bytes)
7. [CQ-Contest] 1 station, 2 callsigns (score: 1): Author: rbowen@iglobal.net (Ralph Bowen); Date: Sat Dec 13 03:31:42 1997; In your part of the country, this is true. Come out to West Texas for some VHF contests. You can CQ for hours on 2M & up & never get a soul. You are to be congratulated on your great scores up there.; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1997-12/msg00281.html (8,763 bytes)
8. [CQ-Contest] 1 station, 2 callsigns (score: 1): Author: desmith@Telalink.Net (Doug Smith); Date: Sun Dec 14 19:12:42 1997; Or the Midwest, for that matter. I've never worked a VHF test from the East Coast, but from the postings I get the impression they're a totally different contest. Some of the rules apparently necess; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1997-12/msg00289.html (8,666 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 8
Page: [1]