Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+10m\s+contest\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+10m\s+contest\s*$/: 13 ]

Total 13 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] 10m contest (score: 1): Author: henry@pacinfo.com (henry); Date: Tue Dec 14 09:11:03 1999; This was my first serious entry into the world of contesting and it was GREAT. Now the question, I try to have a clean signal, as tight as possible with minimal splatter. If you worked me over the we; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1999-12/msg00096.html (7,814 bytes)
2. [CQ-Contest] 10m contest (score: 1): Author: k4sb@mindspring.com (K4SB); Date: Tue Dec 14 19:08:00 1999; Henry brings up a nice point on the bandwidth of SSB signals this past weekend. I for one, have never heard as great a number of stations who were overdriving, and splattering, and the biggest offend; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1999-12/msg00097.html (9,685 bytes)
3. [CQ-Contest] 10m contest (score: 1): Author: jrdavis@collins.rockwell.com (jrdavis@collins.rockwell.com); Date: Tue Dec 14 16:21:07 1999; Henry's question leads to a related one of mine: If I hear a signal that sounds like cr*p, should I inform its owner? For example, this weekend there was a LOUD CW signal out of 6 land that sounded l; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1999-12/msg00100.html (8,255 bytes)
4. [CQ-Contest] 10m contest (score: 1): Author: Tom@Falatech.com (Tom Lindtveit); Date: Wed Dec 15 07:00:08 1999; Absolutely! Nothing worse than trying to get a run going with no takers, or walking the band and having to call too many times to get a simple mult, only to find out I have a signal problem. Lots of; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1999-12/msg00103.html (9,437 bytes)
5. [CQ-Contest] 10m contest (score: 1): Author: ve3bbh@interlog.com (Paul Hicks, VE3ZT); Date: Tue Dec 14 22:01:46 1999; Hi Ed, I have also noticed--with annoyance--the abundance of poor/wide/lousy audio signals during contests. Not really any excuse these days, what with the fabulous equipment that we are using. I thi; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1999-12/msg00111.html (8,717 bytes)
6. [CQ-Contest] 10m contest (score: 1): Author: w7why@harborside.com (Tom Osborne); Date: Wed Dec 15 01:54:57 1999; Hi Henry I usually do tell them, but it usually doesn't do any good. You can tune back half hour later and it still sounds the same. 73 Tom W7WHY -- CQ-Contest on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/_cq-c; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1999-12/msg00112.html (8,218 bytes)
7. [CQ-Contest] 10m contest (score: 1): Author: K4BAI@worldnet.att.net (John T. Laney, III); Date: Tue Dec 14 17:34:03 1999; Hi Jeff: Boy, you had a great signal here most of the weekend. Unusual conditions for 10 meters. On the other hand, we had almost no loud signals here from the W1/2/3/8 areas. I'd always want you to; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1999-12/msg00115.html (10,640 bytes)
8. [CQ-Contest] 10m contest (score: 1): Author: kg5u@hal-pc.org (Dale L. Martin); Date: Tue Dec 14 18:16:09 1999; leads to a related one of mine: I don't know about anyone else, but for me: Yes! Please! It seems to me that if one's signal sounds like crap, it's likely that people may well be passing that person; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1999-12/msg00120.html (8,390 bytes)
9. [CQ-Contest] 10m contest (score: 1): Author: k6km@cncnet.com (Bill); Date: Tue Dec 14 19:42:42 1999; Hey Jeff, If you have the time tell the guy! Don't just send him a report that he probably will hear as 599 no matter what you send. I lost nearly two years of serious contesting because of a messed; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1999-12/msg00121.html (8,590 bytes)
10. [CQ-Contest] 10m contest (score: 1): Author: k4sb@mindspring.com (K4SB); Date: Wed Dec 15 04:08:57 1999; I did give him a 573 report, however, he just ignored it and went on. Probably didn't even register on him that he was not getting a 599... 73 Ed -- CQ-Contest on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/_cq-c; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1999-12/msg00125.html (8,381 bytes)
11. [CQ-Contest] 10m contest (score: 1): Author: brian_smithson@vds.com (Brian Smithson); Date: Wed Dec 15 11:23:02 1999; In a contest he might not have cared, but I'd definately try to let him know - for the same reason, I'd like to know! I never heard back, but on a couple of occassions I've sent QSL cards with more d; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1999-12/msg00130.html (7,983 bytes)
12. [CQ-Contest] 10m contest (score: 1): Author: henry@pacinfo.com (henry); Date: Tue Dec 14 09:11:03 1999; This was my first serious entry into the world of contesting and it was GREAT. Now the question, I try to have a clean signal, as tight as possible with minimal splatter. If you worked me over the we; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1999-12/msg00273.html (7,891 bytes)
13. [CQ-Contest] 10m Contest (score: 1): Author: nx5m@alpha1.net (Robert Pack); Date: Wed Dec 16 23:43:36 1998; I suppose it is time for me to voice my opinion concerning the 10 Meter Contest. The point values are fine. Leave them the way they are. Afterall, changing cw qsos to 3 points would only make for low; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1998-12/msg00133.html (6,912 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 13
Page: [1]