Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+160\s+M\s+Band\s+Plan\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] 160 M Band Plan (score: 1)
Author: "Mike Wetzel" <mjwetzel@comcast.net>
Date: Fri, 29 Oct 2004 11:56:18 -0500
I?ve been more active on topband this season with a new receiving array (8 verticals designed by W8JI) and have been thinking about the CQWW SSB contest and the US band plan. A few years ago Jeff ?ZM
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-10/msg00187.html (8,888 bytes)

2. RE: [CQ-Contest] 160 M Band Plan (score: 1)
Author: "David Robbins K1TTT" <k1ttt@arrl.net>
Date: Fri, 29 Oct 2004 18:47:01 -0000
Actually the arrl bandplan calls for ssb above 1843khz. But that is the arrl plan, not a worldwide plan. Personally I would recommend that outside the US stations tx below 1843 and listen up. David R
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-10/msg00190.html (10,649 bytes)

3. Re: [CQ-Contest] 160 M Band Plan (score: 1)
Author: "David Thompson" <thompson@mindspring.com>
Date: Fri, 29 Oct 2004 16:50:49 -0400
Remedmber that most of the world do not have any operating privileges except 1810 to 1850 where they must operate ALL MODES. The list of operating privileges is not correct. For example PY only has 1
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-10/msg00193.html (8,743 bytes)

4. Re: [CQ-Contest] 160 M Band Plan (score: 1)
Author: Bill Coleman <aa4lr@arrl.net>
Date: Tue, 9 Nov 2004 19:54:00 -0500
On Oct 29, 2004, at 12:56 PM, Mike Wetzel wrote: But in the last couple of years the plan has kind of fallen apart during the contests because it seems like only the US 160 operators remember and try
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-11/msg00191.html (8,775 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu