Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+160\s+M\s+Dupes\s+and\s+congestion\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+160\s+M\s+Dupes\s+and\s+congestion\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] 160 M Dupes and congestion (score: 1): Author: W0uo@cs.com; Date: Tue, 6 Dec 2005 13:15:07 EST; "Another solution would be to not CQ on top of each other or leave more than 50Hz space. " stations calling CQ on the same frequency that obviously could not hear each other. Unfortunately, they ofte; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-12/msg00125.html (8,293 bytes)
2. Re: [CQ-Contest] 160 M Dupes and congestion (score: 1): Author: <steve.root@culligan4water.com>; Date: Tue, 6 Dec 2005 18:56:46 -0500; "BTW, I am finding that many frequency fights can be avoided by one of both stations shifting up or down as little as 100 Hz. It is a win win deal." Jim is absolutely right. I encroached on AA1K and; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-12/msg00133.html (7,166 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]