Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+160\s+meters\s+in\s+the\s+Pacific\s+Northwest\s*$/: 11 ]

Total 11 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] 160 meters in the Pacific Northwest (score: 1)
Author: mike l dormann <w7dra@juno.com>
Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2003 11:13:07 -0800
I could have probably worked all that i did with 5 watts, conditions what they were............ I made 34 contacts in 16 hours, bit sparse to me liking, but of the 34 made, 19 were zone 3 contacts, t
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-12/msg00017.html (9,227 bytes)

2. Re: [CQ-Contest] 160 meters in the Pacific Northwest (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <wrt@dslextreme.com>
Date: Wed, 03 Dec 2003 05:38:02 -0800
On Tue, 2 Dec 2003 11:13:07 -0800, mike l dormann <w7dra@juno.com> wrote: _________________________________________________________ So once you have secured your zero-point mult, you refuse to give o
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-12/msg00037.html (9,137 bytes)

3. Re: [CQ-Contest] 160 meters in the Pacific Northwest (score: 1)
Author: "K0HB" <K-Zero-HB@earthlink.net>
Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2003 15:39:58 -00
The zero-pointers don't bother me a bit (it's a lot faster to send "5NN 4" than to argue), but last weekend at "The Farm" (W0AIH) I was amazed (and amused) at how many zero-pointers came back later
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-12/msg00047.html (9,324 bytes)

4. RE: [CQ-Contest] 160 meters in the Pacific Northwest (score: 1)
Author: "Bernie McClenny, W3UR" <bernie@dailydx.com>
Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2003 19:32:41 -0000
It's better to work them than refuse to work them. If you don't work them they will not call you next time (SS, WPX, other contests). Also the ones that dupe you are totally clueless and more than li
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-12/msg00051.html (10,883 bytes)

5. RE: [CQ-Contest] 160 meters in the Pacific Northwest (score: 1)
Author: "Rex Lint" <rex@lint.mv.com>
Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2003 16:32:49 -0500
There a lots of reasons why someone would dupe you, and cluelessness is only one of them! You might want to take a dupe as a flag that possibly the other station miscopied your call when you worked t
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-12/msg00055.html (9,583 bytes)

6. RE: [CQ-Contest] 160 meters in the Pacific Northwest (score: 1)
Author: "N2TK" <tony.kaz@verizon.net>
Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2003 19:50:33 -0500
Or, the operator (me) may have had a cockpit problem when 4 times during the contest I made a dupe. Sri to those 4 for calling you after I was in your log. Time to crawl in the hole till the next con
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-12/msg00063.html (12,026 bytes)

7. Re: [CQ-Contest] 160 meters in the Pacific Northwest (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <wrt@dslextreme.com>
Date: Wed, 03 Dec 2003 18:55:42 -0800
On Wed, 3 Dec 2003 15:39:58 -00, "K0HB" <K-Zero-HB@earthlink.net> wrote: _________________________________________________________ I'm not talking about dupes. I'm talking about zero-point contacts w
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-12/msg00068.html (9,418 bytes)

8. Re: [CQ-Contest] 160 meters in the Pacific Northwest (score: 1)
Author: Jan Erik Holm <sm2ekm@telia.com>
Date: Thu, 04 Dec 2003 09:13:54 +0100
Yes but since I&acute;m sure that over 90 percent do use PC loging I can&acute;t understand why so many dupes you. In the CT9L M/2 CQWW CW operation that I took part in we worked over 300 dupes and t
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-12/msg00074.html (11,065 bytes)

9. Re: [CQ-Contest] 160 meters in the Pacific Northwest (score: 1)
Author: "Kelly Taylor" <ve4xt@mb.sympatico.ca>
Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2003 19:43:11 -0600
People may need to be more careful, but the truth is this: if a station using computer logging wants to work what you believe is a dupe, then you aren't in their log for the first QSO. Ergo, work 'em
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-12/msg00114.html (12,884 bytes)

10. Re: [CQ-Contest] 160 meters in the Pacific Northwest (score: 1)
Author: Jan Erik Holm <sm2ekm@telia.com>
Date: Fri, 05 Dec 2003 11:49:00 +0100
Yes that&acute;s what we did, for the same reason as you state below, however I still think 318 dubes was too much. Maybe that&acute;s normal and I&acute;m just not used to it, whatever.... as they s
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-12/msg00127.html (12,637 bytes)

11. Re: [CQ-Contest] 160 meters in the Pacific Northwest (score: 1)
Author: Craig Cook <n7or@yahoo.com>
Date: Fri, 5 Dec 2003 07:37:25 -0800 (PST)
Unless you are operating /6Y5. :-) __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Free Pop-Up Blocker - Get it now http://companion.yahoo.com/ -- The world's top contesters battle it out in Finlan
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-12/msg00140.html (9,600 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu