Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+160m\s+in\s+SS\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+160m\s+in\s+SS\?\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] 160m in SS? (score: 1): Author: aa4lr@radio.org (Bill Coleman AA4LR); Date: Wed Jan 14 14:16:54 1998; After participating in an NAQP and seeing the importance (and utility) of 160m contacts, I'm wondering aloud why 160m doesn't play a bigger role in Sweepstakes. Sure, the rules are obviously differen; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1998-01/msg00283.html (6,927 bytes)
2. [CQ-Contest] 160m in SS? (score: 1): Author: tgstewart@pepco.com (tgstewart@pepco.com); Date: Thu Jan 15 07:23:30 1998; I think you answered your own question! No mults = no activity = no 160 and little 10 for now. 73, Ty K3MM -- CQ-Contest on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/_cq-contest/ Administrative requests: cq-con; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1998-01/msg00311.html (6,434 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]