Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+2002\s+NAQP\s+CW\s+\-\s+All\s+Final\s+Claimed\s+Scores\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] 2002 NAQP CW - All Final Claimed Scores (score: 1)
Author: mwdink@eskimo.com (mwdink@eskimo.com)
Date: Mon Sep 9 11:25:00 2002
2002 NAQP CW - Final Claimed Scores Submit logs by: September 3, 2002 E-mail logs to: cwnaqp@ncjweb.com Mail logs to: Bob Selbrede, K6ZZ 6200 Natoma Ave. Mojave, CA 93501 USA 3830 Score Web Page - ht
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-09/msg00087.html (18,922 bytes)

2. [CQ-Contest] 2002 NAQP CW - All Final Claimed Scores (score: 1)
Author: kc5ajx@hotmail.com (Rick Bullon)
Date: Tue Sep 10 23:22:12 2002
How can there be a HP entry in the NAQP CW results???? The power limit is 100 watts max, or did they change the rules?? Call QSOs Mults hr Score Club/Team All Single Op HP KU1CW 518 137 8 70,966 SMC
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-09/msg00102.html (7,092 bytes)

3. [CQ-Contest] 2002 NAQP CW - All Final Claimed Scores (score: 1)
Author: nq4u@bellsouth.net (Jimmy Floyd)
Date: Tue Sep 10 19:34:07 2002
They have not changed the rules. Kinda makes you wonder just how many operators turn on the amplifier even though the rules say otherwise. Jimmy NQ4U
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-09/msg00103.html (6,998 bytes)

4. [CQ-Contest] 2002 NAQP CW - All Final Claimed Scores (score: 1)
Author: bhorn@hornucopia.com (Bruce Horn)
Date: Wed Sep 11 07:46:57 2002
A simpler explanation may be that the contester selected the wrong power category when completing the web score reporting form. On the other hand, some contesters are unfamiliar with the NAQP power l
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-09/msg00106.html (7,645 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu