Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+2006\s+SSB\s+WPX\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+2006\s+SSB\s+WPX\s*$/: 7 ]

Total 7 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] 2006 SSB WPX (score: 1): Author: Alan Zack <k7acz@cox.net>; Date: Thu, 13 Apr 2006 13:14:30 -0700; I would like to run a situation past the group: Ham A enters the WPX SSB. He has a very common prefix. Ham B is a former no code Tech who has a new 5 WPM Extra license. As many of these new 5 WPM Ext; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-04/msg00141.html (7,588 bytes)
2. Re: [CQ-Contest] 2006 SSB WPX (score: 1): Author: "Stuart Santelmann KC1F" <kc1f@adelphia.net>; Date: Thu, 13 Apr 2006 22:56:38 -0000; Yes, it's legal to do it. I know, because I asked the FCC about the "borrowing callsigns" practice now commonly in use in WPX, and got email responses confirming that it's OK (no, I didn't try to fi; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-04/msg00142.html (8,880 bytes)
3. Re: [CQ-Contest] 2006 SSB WPX (score: 1): Author: John Laney <k4bai@worldnet.att.net>; Date: Fri, 14 Apr 2006 09:57:04 -0400; Stu's proposed change to CQ WPX rules would appear to eliminate the use of Club calls in WPX Contests. I am pretty sure that is not what was intended, but this factor needs to be considered if any ch; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-04/msg00151.html (7,160 bytes)
4. Re: [CQ-Contest] 2006 SSB WPX (score: 1): Author: "David Robbins K1TTT" <k1ttt@arrl.net>; Date: Fri, 14 Apr 2006 17:51:28 -0000; Even requiring it to be the operator or 'station owner' wouldn't stop callsign borrowing in the states. Since the fcc doesn't require a separate 'station license' any more anyone could own any statio; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-04/msg00153.html (11,309 bytes)
5. Re: [CQ-Contest] 2006 SSB WPX (score: 1): Author: "Kelly Taylor" <ve4xt@mts.net>; Date: Fri, 14 Apr 2006 14:34:42 -0500; Personally, I think the callsign borrowing thing is much ado about nothing. To quote Charlie Sheen in Ferris Bueller's Day Off: "You could ditch." If there's nothing stopping Ham A from doing it, the; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-04/msg00155.html (7,731 bytes)
6. Re: [CQ-Contest] 2006 SSB WPX (score: 1): Author: "W0MU Mike Fatchett" <w0mu@w0mu.com>; Date: Fri, 14 Apr 2006 14:10:01 -0600; I thought that was one of the fun things about WPX was the plentiful mults. Makes the WPX something other than a DX test from the western US. Mike W0MU Personally, I think the callsign borrowing thin; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-04/msg00157.html (8,956 bytes)
7. Re: [CQ-Contest] 2006 SSB WPX (score: 1): Author: "Andrew Faber" <andrew.faber@gte.net>; Date: Fri, 14 Apr 2006 13:15:56 -0700; Kelly, I have to agree. Callsign borrowing leads to more interesting prefixes in WPX contest. I had a surreal experience in 2004 when I was operating in WPX SSB as P40Y from Aruba. I was being QRMed; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-04/msg00158.html (9,510 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 7
Page: [1]