Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+2009\s+CQWW\s+CW\s+participation\s+figures\s+and\s+logs\s+accuracy\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+2009\s+CQWW\s+CW\s+participation\s+figures\s+and\s+logs\s+accuracy\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] 2009 CQWW CW participation figures and logs accuracy (score: 1): Author: Stan <ua1out@yahoo.com>; Date: Sun, 1 Aug 2010 12:14:15 +0000 (GMT); Hi I was trying to figure out how many stations took part in the last CQWW CW and found some interesting figures. CQWW 2009 CW contains a total of 3.870.544 QSOs extracted from 5514 logs. Total numbe; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-08/msg00001.html (9,676 bytes)
2. Re: [CQ-Contest] 2009 CQWW CW participation figures and logs accuracy (score: 1): Author: "Randy Thompson K5ZD" <k5zd@charter.net>; Date: Sun, 01 Aug 2010 10:00:54 -0800; Very interesting analysis. I can offer some additional data based on WPX CW 2009. Logs received: 3,649 Total QSOs: 2,224,164 Total callsigns found: 35,451 Callsigns worked only ONE time (i.e., unique; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-08/msg00006.html (11,262 bytes)
3. Re: [CQ-Contest] 2009 CQWW CW participation figures and logs accuracy (score: 1): Author: David Gilbert <xdavid@cis-broadband.com>; Date: Sun, 01 Aug 2010 10:39:24 -0700; That was also very interesting, Randy. Obviously all of those 2,224,164 QSOs were made between one or two of the 3,649 stations who submitted logs, but I wonder how many additional QSOs were made bet; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-08/msg00008.html (13,107 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]