- 1. [CQ-Contest] 24 hour category? (score: 1)
- Author: w2up@mindspring.com (Barry )
- Date: Tue Feb 19 08:54:32 2002
- Hi all, I made the following comments in my 3830 writeup, and received a few emails agreeing. Would be interested in hearing other comments... As I was unavailable for contesting Sunday, I decided to
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-02/msg00253.html (7,365 bytes)
- 2. [CQ-Contest] 24 hour category? (score: 1)
- Author: N5RP@pdq.net (Bob, N5RP)
- Date: Tue Feb 19 09:31:44 2002
- ==> Sounds to me like you had fun, and figured out a way to optimize your having fun. You've already made a new category. That category of "self satisfaction" we keep hearing about. Bravo !! Bob Perr
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-02/msg00256.html (7,867 bytes)
- 3. [CQ-Contest] 24 hour category? (score: 1)
- Author: Jimk8mr@aol.com (Jimk8mr@aol.com)
- Date: Tue Feb 19 11:35:37 2002
- it There's nothing wrong with creating your own category. I did that years ago with "Single Op Multi Station" in CW SS, and am still having a lot of fun doing that. I don't think SOMS in SS or a 24 h
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-02/msg00261.html (8,451 bytes)
- 4. [CQ-Contest] 24 hour category? (score: 1)
- Author: millersg@dmapub.dma.org (Steve Miller)
- Date: Tue Feb 19 12:55:32 2002
- I think adding any official category that encourages limited operation time is a bad idea. We need more activity not less! Not necessarily - it just provides a lesser endurance requirement. But what
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-02/msg00266.html (9,421 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu