Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+24\s+hour\s+category\?\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] 24 hour category? (score: 1)
Author: w2up@mindspring.com (Barry )
Date: Tue Feb 19 08:54:32 2002
Hi all, I made the following comments in my 3830 writeup, and received a few emails agreeing. Would be interested in hearing other comments... As I was unavailable for contesting Sunday, I decided to
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-02/msg00253.html (7,365 bytes)

2. [CQ-Contest] 24 hour category? (score: 1)
Author: N5RP@pdq.net (Bob, N5RP)
Date: Tue Feb 19 09:31:44 2002
==> Sounds to me like you had fun, and figured out a way to optimize your having fun. You've already made a new category. That category of "self satisfaction" we keep hearing about. Bravo !! Bob Perr
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-02/msg00256.html (7,867 bytes)

3. [CQ-Contest] 24 hour category? (score: 1)
Author: Jimk8mr@aol.com (Jimk8mr@aol.com)
Date: Tue Feb 19 11:35:37 2002
it There's nothing wrong with creating your own category. I did that years ago with "Single Op Multi Station" in CW SS, and am still having a lot of fun doing that. I don't think SOMS in SS or a 24 h
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-02/msg00261.html (8,451 bytes)

4. [CQ-Contest] 24 hour category? (score: 1)
Author: millersg@dmapub.dma.org (Steve Miller)
Date: Tue Feb 19 12:55:32 2002
I think adding any official category that encourages limited operation time is a bad idea. We need more activity not less! Not necessarily - it just provides a lesser endurance requirement. But what
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-02/msg00266.html (9,421 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu