Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+3\s+QSO\s+penalty\s+PS\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+3\s+QSO\s+penalty\s+PS\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] 3 QSO penalty PS (score: 1): Author: k3bu@optonline.net; Date: Tue, 01 Aug 2006 10:28:36 -0400; Howdy fellow contesters. Just postscript to the 3 QSO "penalty" thing. I made my comments addressing the silliness of the 3 QSO penalty in present times and state of technology and tried to amplify m; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-08/msg00004.html (11,075 bytes)
2. Re: [CQ-Contest] 3 QSO penalty PS (score: 1): Author: "David Robbins K1TTT" <k1ttt@arrl.net>; Date: Tue, 1 Aug 2006 21:17:37 -0000; The reason you get no sympathy around here is that everyone who participates in a contest gets scored the same way. You are right, its not like the old days where only the top few logs in a category; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-08/msg00008.html (14,881 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]