Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+6M\s+contest\s+discussion\s*$/: 6 ]

Total 6 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] 6M contest discussion (score: 1)
Author: "Mark Beckwith" <mark@concertart.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2003 16:04:06 -0600
band VHF contest. It would be to my interest. Here's why: Some have noted correctly that operating "single-band 6M" in the June VHF Contest would not be the same as holding a 10M contest knock-off o
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-12/msg00344.html (9,316 bytes)

2. Re: [CQ-Contest] 6M contest discussion (score: 1)
Author: "Chuck" <k3ft@erols.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2003 20:47:16 -0500
A 6m Contest that Mark talks about would be one that Larson E. Rapp W1OU would be most pleased to be a part of! (if you recall who THAT is.. you are as old - or older - than I am) 73 K3FT -- The worl
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-12/msg00348.html (8,310 bytes)

3. Re: [CQ-Contest] 6M contest discussion (score: 1)
Author: "Lee Hiers" <aa4ga@contesting.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2003 21:19:30 -0500
Sign me up! Except I don't think ARRL sponsors the single band sprints any more...although they're still there... 73 de Lee -- Lee Hiers, AA4GA Cornelia, Georgia -- The world's top contesters battle
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-12/msg00352.html (8,234 bytes)

4. Re: [CQ-Contest] 6M contest discussion (score: 1)
Author: Zack Widup <w9sz@prairienet.org>
Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2003 22:56:46 -0600 (CST)
Yeah ... some of us "gentle readers" remember him! :-) Did anyone ever find out who he really was? 73, Zack W9SZ -- The world's top contesters battle it out in Finland! THE OFFICIAL FILM of WRTC 2002
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-12/msg00368.html (8,320 bytes)

5. Re: [CQ-Contest] 6M contest discussion (score: 1)
Author: John Laney <k4bai@worldnet.att.net>
Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2003 10:01:27 -0500
If some of the existing contests would permit credit for SSB and CW QSOs in the same contest or give extra credit for CW QSOs, it would encourage more CW activity on 6M. That is what is done for most
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-12/msg00376.html (8,175 bytes)

6. Re: [CQ-Contest] 6M contest discussion (score: 1)
Author: Doug Smith W9WI <w9wi@earthlink.net>
Date: 18 Dec 2003 10:32:03 -0600
I seem to remember in the writeup for a November Sweepstakes in the late 1950s that at least one entrant made a significant number of QSOs on 6 meters. I guess Rule 1 would prohibit that today. -- Do
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-12/msg00381.html (8,517 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 6
Page: [1]
This search system is powered by Namazu