Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+73\s+watts\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+73\s+watts\s*$/: 11 ]

Total 11 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] 73 watts (score: 1): Author: chris quale <la8om@outlook.com>; Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2017 13:23:34 +0000; Art; I didn't participate in ARRL DX SSB in any of the aforementioned optional ways. But I listened in on the bands a couple of times. Surely some of you who took part must have come across him, the; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-03/msg00224.html (8,289 bytes)
2. Re: [CQ-Contest] 73 watts (score: 1): Author: Ron Notarius W3WN <wn3vaw@verizon.net>; Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2017 07:35:25 -0600 (CST); Actually Chris, there were at least two different stations doing that. Now a real stinker would sit back and say "Can they PROVE they were only running exactly 73 Watts output?" But me? I enjoyed the; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-03/msg00235.html (8,910 bytes)
3. Re: [CQ-Contest] 73 watts (score: 1): Author: Steve Lott <lottsphoto@gmail.com>; Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2017 08:19:36 -0600; I agree with run, thought it was an excellent touch he could have easily just said 100 watts but no fun in that hey I logged both of them that gave me 73 bet they both had a few that said no what is; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-03/msg00240.html (10,753 bytes)
4. Re: [CQ-Contest] 73 watts (score: 1): Author: Steve Lott <lottsphoto@gmail.com>; Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2017 08:20:06 -0600; ron not run gee my keboard typing :! http://www.KG5VK.com My Ham Radio Friends _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contestin; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-03/msg00241.html (11,596 bytes)
5. Re: [CQ-Contest] 73 watts (score: 1): Author: Mike Ritz <w7vo@comcast.net>; Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2017 14:53:33 +0000 (UTC); Hey, at least they weren't saying "RRR" or "TTT", or some other obscure exchange...... 73; Mike W7VO -- Original Message -- Actually Chris, there were at least two different stations doing that. Now; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-03/msg00244.html (9,850 bytes)
6. Re: [CQ-Contest] 73 watts (score: 1): Author: "Eric Gruff" <egruff@cox.net>; Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2017 08:50:54 -0800; For those of you complaining about the "73" power report, I have to say "really?". The rules say that the DX exchange is (emphasis mine), " DX stations send signal report and power (number or abbrevi; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-03/msg00250.html (8,467 bytes)
7. Re: [CQ-Contest] 73 watts (score: 1): Author: Jim Stahl via CQ-Contest <cq-contest@contesting.com>; Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2017 13:29:57 -0500; At least they werent running fifty nine watts. (Or 599 watts on CW) 73 - Jim K8MR _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contes; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-03/msg00254.html (9,496 bytes)
8. Re: [CQ-Contest] 73 watts (score: 1): Author: Jeff Draughn <n0ost99@gmail.com>; Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2017 23:34:12 +0000; Maybe he was just saying 59 and best wishes... _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contes; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-03/msg00263.html (10,997 bytes)
9. Re: [CQ-Contest] 73 watts (score: 1): Author: "Eric Gruff" <egruff@cox.net>; Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2017 15:00:18 -0800; Jim, Or 1 milliwatt! Can you imagine the confusion with "0.001" or "1 MW"? With no capitalization in CW, it might be interpreted as 1,000,000 W, and then everyone on the reflector would be screaming; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-03/msg00264.html (10,181 bytes)
10. [CQ-Contest] 73 watts (score: 1): Author: Jeff Clarke <ku8e@ku8e.com>; Date: Mon, 13 Mar 2017 00:08:28 -0400; Sending a unique power like "73" cuts down on dupes. Especially when your call sign is spotted wrong. It's even worse if the station doesn't identify and people depend on that spot to get your call.; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-03/msg00297.html (7,117 bytes)
11. Re: [CQ-Contest] 73 watts (score: 1): Author: Barry <w2up@comcast.net>; Date: Mon, 13 Mar 2017 08:39:57 -0600; Poor operating procedures shouldn't be rewarded. May the non-IDers suffer with many dupes from being spotted with busted calls. Barry W2UP Jeff -- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast ant; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-03/msg00307.html (8,118 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 11
Page: [1]