Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+80\s+meter\s+CQWW\s+SSB\s+Question\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+80\s+meter\s+CQWW\s+SSB\s+Question\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] 80 meter CQWW SSB Question (score: 1): Author: Steve London <n2icarrl@gmail.com>; Date: Wed, 03 Oct 2007 08:11:06 -0600; This will be the first year that CQWW SSB will be run with the expanded USA phone band down to 3600 kHz. If you had a high-performance, but narrow-banded 80 meter antenna that could only cover 100 kH; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-10/msg00059.html (6,632 bytes)
2. Re: [CQ-Contest] 80 meter CQWW SSB Question (score: 1): Author: "Tom Osborne" <w7why@verizon.net>; Date: Wed, 03 Oct 2007 17:54:47 -0700; Hi Steve I think I'd still hang around 3.750 as it will be a while before guys start moving wayway down the band. It seems to me that working down around 3.600 would actually be better because you co; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-10/msg00092.html (7,452 bytes)
3. Re: [CQ-Contest] 80 meter CQWW SSB Question (score: 1): Author: "Mike McCarthy, W1NR" <lists@w1nr.net>; Date: Fri, 05 Oct 2007 07:13:54 -0400; During ARRL SSB TX below 3750 really didn't work very well. Most of the multis still TX above 3800 and listen above 3700. I have an inverted V at 110' with a Heathkit remote antenna tuner that works; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-10/msg00094.html (8,211 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]