Gang, Just as food for thought as we approach another contest season, I'm noticed a lot of the empty spectrum between the phone and CW portions of the 80M band. I know that in some countries that the
Hmmmm...might be a lot easier to get it started for domestic contests as international allocations and convention are difficult to budge. The major problem, as I see it, is that we would then lose m
Author: K4BAI@worldnet.att.net (John T. Laney, III)
Date: Wed Sep 3 09:53:03 1997
Hi Paul: We need to remember that a lot of cw nets and digital operations use the frequencies on 80 that you refer to. I have no objection to moving contesting frequencies up there (the MD QSO Party
I would worry about clashing with traffic nets that operate in that frequency range. They are bad enough on ssb- I'd hate to stir them up on cw also. My opinion. KM0L Steve in KC -- band. Phone -- CQ
No way....the low end is the low end, and "press" won't change that in a decade.....plus all of us have honed our squeezing in techniques to ensure we can work the really good stuff down in the Extra
Gang, Just as food for thought as we approach another contest season, I'm noticed a lot of the empty spectrum between the phone and CW portions of the 80M band. I know that in some countries that the
I would worry about clashing with traffic nets that operate in that frequency range. They are bad enough on ssb- I'd hate to stir them up on cw also. My opinion. KM0L Steve in KC -- band. Phone -- CQ
Gang, Just as food for thought as we approach another contest season, I'm noticed a lot of the empty spectrum between the phone and CW portions of the 80M band. I know that in some countries that the
I would worry about clashing with traffic nets that operate in that frequency range. They are bad enough on ssb- I'd hate to stir them up on cw also. My opinion. KM0L Steve in KC -- band. Phone -- CQ