- 1. [CQ-Contest] 9M0C will not contest in ARRL! (score: 1)
- Author: EWALSH/0004504465@MCIMAIL.COM (Eugene Walsh)
- Date: Fri Feb 20 01:47:45 1998
- Someone said:......... """ The group will stay fully operational until around 0600z on Monday 23rd and will keep 10MHz CW going until 2400z, just a few hours before the plane arrives to take them bac
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1998-02/msg00211.html (9,142 bytes)
- 2. [CQ-Contest] 9M0C will not contest in ARRL! (score: 1)
- Author: k8dd@contesting.com (Hank Kohl K8DD)
- Date: Fri Feb 20 10:02:39 1998
- At 01:47 AM 2/20/98 -0500, I saw: Something about That's too bad......But I guess that is their choice. If I were in that position where I didn't want to work the participants of the ARRL CW contest
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1998-02/msg00215.html (8,375 bytes)
- 3. [CQ-Contest] 9M0C will not contest in ARRL! (score: 1)
- Author: w4an@contesting.com (Bill Fisher - W4AN)
- Date: Fri Feb 20 10:26:18 1998
- And while we are at it... could we please set aside 160M for only non-contest DX QSO's. DX QSO's with countries already confirmed would not be illegal, but would be viewed as piggish and not in the
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1998-02/msg00219.html (7,677 bytes)
- 4. [CQ-Contest] 9M0C will not contest in ARRL! (score: 1)
- Author: TOMK5RC@aol.com (TOMK5RC@aol.com)
- Date: Sun Feb 22 16:48:41 1998
- To further complicate matters, they have been active on the CW bands all weekend, working W stations, but not giving a contest exchange. I wonder how many logs they wound up in? Tom, K5RC/7 -- CQ-Con
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1998-02/msg00232.html (6,850 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu