Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+A\s+queston\s+on\s+dupes\.\.\.\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+A\s+queston\s+on\s+dupes\.\.\.\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] A queston on dupes... (score: 1): Author: "Rick Mintz" <Rmintz@Rochester.rr.com>; Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2005 15:03:15 -0400; Hi Gang, When a station calls you that is already in your log, should you, after working him again, delete the earlier log entry? Obviously Writelog will show the second QSO as a dupe but the Cabrill; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-09/msg00266.html (7,040 bytes)
2. Re: [CQ-Contest] A queston on dupes... (score: 1): Author: George Fremin III <geoiii@kkn.net>; Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2005 20:07:31 -0700; No - keep all of the contacts that you make in your log. You will not have points deducted for dupes in your log. -- George Fremin III - K5TR geoiii@kkn.net http://www.kkn.net/~k5tr _________________; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-09/msg00272.html (7,589 bytes)
3. Re: [CQ-Contest] A queston on dupes... (score: 1): Author: Radiosporting Fan <radiosporting@yahoo.com>; Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2005 04:05:22 -0700 (PDT); Rick, Not to worry. Cabrillo is designed to simply "reveal what was worked". There is no judgement on the data that is "revealed". That is the job of the Robot that accepts the log. Log everything th; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-09/msg00274.html (7,932 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]