Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+ARRL\-DX\s+SSB\s+\:\s+How\s+were\s+condx\s+\?\s*$/: 9 ]

Total 9 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] ARRL-DX SSB : How were condx ? (score: 1)
Author: "Yannick (XV4Y)" <yannick.devos@online.fr>
Date: Mon, 5 Mar 2012 14:35:31 +0700
Hi, Last week I build and installed a hybrid-Moxon for 15m-10m-6m with fixed beam (could be manually turned but not real time). I was a happy DXer with my vertical but wanted something more for conte
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2012-03/msg00020.html (8,161 bytes)

2. Re: [CQ-Contest] ARRL-DX SSB : How were condx ? (score: 1)
Author: Steve London <n2icarrl@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 05 Mar 2012 15:29:04 -0700
Hi Yan, This seems very strange. Here are some QSO's from my log showing stations worked on 15 meters from your area: QSO: 21201 PH 2012-03-03 0006 N2IC 59 NM YB1AR 59 500 QSO: 21201 PH 2012-03-03 00
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2012-03/msg00027.html (11,398 bytes)

3. Re: [CQ-Contest] ARRL-DX SSB : How were condx ? (score: 1)
Author: "Yannick (XV4Y)" <yannick.devos@online.fr>
Date: Wed, 7 Mar 2012 13:47:02 +0700
Hi Steve, Interesting comment. Congratulation. I think I heard 9V1YC calling you on saturday but here I was not able to copy you, not even a whisper... I am not surprise you have a lot of YBs in your
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2012-03/msg00040.html (10,603 bytes)

4. Re: [CQ-Contest] ARRL-DX SSB : How were condx ? (score: 1)
Author: "Yannick DEVOS (XV4Y)" <yannick.devos@online.fr>
Date: Wed, 7 Mar 2012 22:09:32 +0700
Hi Tom, Yes I agree with you that condx can vary greatly with only hundred of miles, especially when condx are tricky. That's why I needed several opinions because it only has a statistical value. I
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2012-03/msg00041.html (10,797 bytes)

5. Re: [CQ-Contest] ARRL-DX SSB : How were condx ? (score: 1)
Author: "Tom W8JI" <w8ji@w8ji.com>
Date: Wed, 7 Mar 2012 07:32:33 -0500
<<<I am not surprise you have a lot of YBs in your log. The path between you both should be easier. I have received private e-mail from several people confirming condx were tricky and other stations
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2012-03/msg00042.html (9,454 bytes)

6. Re: [CQ-Contest] ARRL-DX SSB : How were condx ? (score: 1)
Author: "Tom W8JI" <w8ji@w8ji.com>
Date: Wed, 7 Mar 2012 10:18:21 -0500
<<<Yes I agree with you that condx can vary greatly with only hundred of miles, especially when condx are tricky. That's why I needed several opinions because it only has a statistical value. I was n
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2012-03/msg00043.html (8,682 bytes)

7. Re: [CQ-Contest] ARRL-DX SSB : How were condx ? (score: 1)
Author: "Yannick (XV4Y)" <yannick.devos@online.fr>
Date: Fri, 9 Mar 2012 14:19:39 +0700
Hi Tom, Sorry for the delayed answer. Gain is over "real ground" as MMana computes it. The Moxon is around 11dBi when at the exact goal frequency, you quickly loose 1dB when going far from it. It is
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2012-03/msg00064.html (10,403 bytes)

8. Re: [CQ-Contest] ARRL-DX SSB : How were condx ? (score: 1)
Author: "Mueller, David ENG2" <David.W.Mueller@uscg.mil>
Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2012 10:57:29 -1000
Yan, On Guam, I am equally distant from the East Coast of North America and Western Europe. Many times I have noticed suppressed conditions to NA during my local morning, followed by excellent condit
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2012-03/msg00224.html (9,479 bytes)

9. Re: [CQ-Contest] ARRL-DX SSB : How were condx ? (score: 1)
Author: "Yannick (XV4Y)" <yannick.devos@online.fr>
Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2012 20:34:53 +0700
Hi Dave, I have no experience on 160m and really little on 80m so I will not talk about low bands. However, during the last two years I have been actively chasing DX and trying to learn the propagati
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2012-03/msg00237.html (10,914 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu