Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+ARRL\s+10\s*$/: 13 ]

Total 13 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] ARRL 10 (score: 1)
Author: "PT7ZZ, Andre Coelho" <pt7zz@fordx.org>
Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2008 23:11:16 -0300
Hi every1, Maybe a silly comment, but .... The well known conditions in 10m nowdays looks like pushing us to a kind of death zone, where no one knows what path to follow ... In my case, and i believe
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-12/msg00359.html (7,280 bytes)

2. Re: [CQ-Contest] ARRL 10 (score: 1)
Author: PY2NY Gmail <py2ny.vitor@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2008 10:15:24 -0200
Not, for sure! On last 2 or 3 years, I donīt remember, I did ARRL 10m Contest at QRP class, due a lot of social commitments. Now, will be the same, and I am sure that will be possible to do, at least
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-12/msg00365.html (9,199 bytes)

3. [CQ-Contest] ARRL 10 (score: 1)
Author: kr2q@optimum.net
Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2008 12:33:33 +0000 (GMT)
Dear Friends from Brasil (and everyone else too).... It is just like the other bands...when there is no contest, the bands are relatively quiet. When the contest starts, all of a sudden the band is a
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-12/msg00366.html (7,585 bytes)

4. Re: [CQ-Contest] ARRL 10 (score: 1)
Author: "Jimmy O. Floyd" <nq4u@mtars.org>
Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2008 06:43:05 -0600
Andre, I have a group of new hams (about 5 of them) that want to participate so we will at least be on during Saturday. With propagation the way it is I figured it would be a good time to "teach" rad
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-12/msg00367.html (8,979 bytes)

5. Re: [CQ-Contest] ARRL 10 (score: 1)
Author: k9or@comcast.net
Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2008 16:47:03 +0000 (UTC)
Same idea here in the Black Hole - look for NSRC (Chicago-area) participants 28.430-28.440 between 2100 and 2200Z Saturday. 73 Randy K9OR I have a group of new hams (about 5 of them) that want to par
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-12/msg00374.html (7,831 bytes)

6. Re: [CQ-Contest] ARRL 10 (score: 1)
Author: "W4ZW" <w4zw@comcast.net>
Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2008 13:45:21 -0500
I, too, will be on from our new Pine View School Amateur radio Club, W4PVC, with 8 new students who were licensed last week. We did a little "how to radio" last week, and this Sunday from 2-5 EST we'
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-12/msg00379.html (8,947 bytes)

7. Re: [CQ-Contest] ARRL 10 (score: 1)
Author: "KC4HW" <jimjohnson@alaweb.com>
Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2008 14:43:08 -0600
I wonder if this is a violation of the rules to pre-arranged a frequency and time for contacts? Jim/KC4HW _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-12/msg00380.html (8,935 bytes)

8. Re: [CQ-Contest] ARRL 10 (score: 1)
Author: KI9A@aol.com
Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2008 17:36:48 EST
Um, no. there is no one single time, or single freq, or single station asking for a sked. Local/regional clubs normally have a club activity time. 73- Chuck KI9A In a message dated 12/12/2008 4:35:06
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-12/msg00383.html (9,236 bytes)

9. Re: [CQ-Contest] ARRL 10 (score: 1)
Author: "Jimmy O. Floyd" <nq4u@mtars.org>
Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2008 19:29:29 -0600
This type of response is all uncalled for. I was not making a sked or pre-arrainging a contact for anything. I do not believe the other station was either. If you meant this in any other way please e
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-12/msg00386.html (10,117 bytes)

10. Re: [CQ-Contest] ARRL 10 (score: 1)
Author: "Chad WE9V" <chad.we9v@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2008 20:04:32 -0600
Chuck is correct. Directly from the ARRL: "Prearranging contacts and advertising specific operating times and frequencies shown to be of questionable value, before the contest is discouraged. The rea
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-12/msg00387.html (11,395 bytes)

11. Re: [CQ-Contest] ARRL 10 (score: 1)
Author: "KC4HW" <jimjohnson@alaweb.com>
Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2008 21:38:20 -0600
Well I was just asking a question! Seemed a questionable area to me! But if this is considered acceptable good practice then so be it. Jim/KC4HW _______________________________________________ CQ-Con
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-12/msg00388.html (10,825 bytes)

12. Re: [CQ-Contest] ARRL 10 (score: 1)
Author: Jimk8mr@aol.com
Date: Sat, 13 Dec 2008 09:47:51 EST
For years there have been locally arranged "activity hours" in VHF contests. Unfortunately, the 10 meter contest is likely to be all too much like a VHF contest. 73 - Jim K8MR In a message dated 12/1
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-12/msg00392.html (8,906 bytes)

13. Re: [CQ-Contest] ARRL 10 (score: 1)
Author: "W4ZW" <w4zw@comcast.net>
Date: Sat, 13 Dec 2008 10:01:08 -0500
And we wonder why there are so few new hams? A bunch of kids who are new hams don't care about "competing", they are more interested in finding out how the radio works. Get serious guys! I have 8 new
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-12/msg00393.html (13,437 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 13
Page: [1]
This search system is powered by Namazu