Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+ARRL\s+10\s+Meter\s+Not\-In\-Log\s*$/: 16 ]

Total 16 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] ARRL 10 Meter Not-In-Log (score: 1)
Author: jmellis@ihug.co.nz (Martin Ellis)
Date: Tue Aug 10 00:47:42 1999
Good morning, I got my scoring report from K8CC and was concerned to find 6 Not-In-Log QSOs. These will each incur a penalty of three equivalent QSOs. I wish to improve my accuracy in future contests
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/1999-08/msg00068.html (9,402 bytes)

2. [CQ-Contest] ARRL 10 Meter Not-In-Log (score: 1)
Author: W2CE@aol.com (W2CE@aol.com)
Date: Mon Aug 9 11:31:32 1999
problem People better get used to uniques and no log entries from very small operations, especially in new tech plus operators on 10 meters. It's fun to work a few contest stations but not being expe
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/1999-08/msg00070.html (9,096 bytes)

3. [CQ-Contest] ARRL 10 Meter Not-In-Log (score: 1)
Author: n0ss@earthlink.net (Tom Hammond - N0SS)
Date: Mon Aug 9 11:00:22 1999
Martin: I think I'd perhaps be a bit more concerned about the second one, because I suspect that more folks might be hurt by the fact that other operators, although they operated both modes, only sen
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/1999-08/msg00072.html (9,291 bytes)

4. [CQ-Contest] ARRL 10 Meter Not-In-Log (score: 1)
Author: mgilmer@gnlp.com (Gilmer, Mike)
Date: Mon Aug 9 12:01:50 1999
Looked at the a This same kind of thing could happen with Single-Band entries in CQWW or ARRLDX that work a few guys on other bands for "fun". Lot's of nuisance situations! Mike N2MG -- CQ-Contest o
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/1999-08/msg00073.html (8,550 bytes)

5. [CQ-Contest] ARRL 10 Meter Not-In-Log (score: 1)
Author: jono@enteract.com (Jon Ogden)
Date: Mon Aug 9 16:18:56 1999
Technically, speaking, Trey I think you are correct. It is incumbent upon BOTH stations to make sure that ALL info is correctly logged. However, in such a case as I get your call right, but you don't
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/1999-08/msg00076.html (9,320 bytes)

6. [CQ-Contest] ARRL 10 Meter Not-In-Log (score: 1)
Author: bhorn@hornucopia.com (Bruce Horn)
Date: Mon Aug 9 21:44:52 1999
Some comments on log checking: ZL1ANJ's example 1: The task for the log checking software and human log checker in this case is to decide whether K1TTT worked ZL1ANJ, but miss-copied the call sign, o
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/1999-08/msg00077.html (11,468 bytes)

7. [CQ-Contest] ARRL 10 Meter Not-In-Log (score: 1)
Author: KI9A@aol.com (KI9A@aol.com)
Date: Mon Aug 9 21:55:01 1999
<< According to what I know, you reported back the info correctly yet you typed it wrong.). I would argue in this general case that both stations should get zero points. IMHO, it's a bit, well, I dun
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/1999-08/msg00078.html (8,860 bytes)

8. [CQ-Contest] ARRL 10 Meter Not-In-Log (score: 1)
Author: roberto.soro@sia.it (Soro Roberto)
Date: Tue Aug 10 13:27:28 1999
Here it is very hard to understand how a station that report 599 1008 could be unique!! 1007 other people should have worked that guy in the contest and none of them sent in the log! If this is the c
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/1999-08/msg00080.html (8,698 bytes)

9. [CQ-Contest] ARRL 10 Meter Not-In-Log (score: 1)
Author: jmellis@ihug.co.nz (Martin Ellis)
Date: Tue Aug 10 00:47:42 1999
Good morning, I got my scoring report from K8CC and was concerned to find 6 Not-In-Log QSOs. These will each incur a penalty of three equivalent QSOs. I wish to improve my accuracy in future contests
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/1999-08/msg00329.html (9,286 bytes)

10. [CQ-Contest] ARRL 10 Meter Not-In-Log (score: 1)
Author: W2CE@aol.com (W2CE@aol.com)
Date: Mon Aug 9 11:31:32 1999
problem People better get used to uniques and no log entries from very small operations, especially in new tech plus operators on 10 meters. It's fun to work a few contest stations but not being expe
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/1999-08/msg00331.html (9,201 bytes)

11. [CQ-Contest] ARRL 10 Meter Not-In-Log (score: 1)
Author: n0ss@earthlink.net (Tom Hammond - N0SS)
Date: Mon Aug 9 11:00:22 1999
Martin: I think I'd perhaps be a bit more concerned about the second one, because I suspect that more folks might be hurt by the fact that other operators, although they operated both modes, only sen
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/1999-08/msg00333.html (9,424 bytes)

12. [CQ-Contest] ARRL 10 Meter Not-In-Log (score: 1)
Author: mgilmer@gnlp.com (Gilmer, Mike)
Date: Mon Aug 9 12:01:50 1999
Looked at the a This same kind of thing could happen with Single-Band entries in CQWW or ARRLDX that work a few guys on other bands for "fun". Lot's of nuisance situations! Mike N2MG -- CQ-Contest o
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/1999-08/msg00334.html (8,674 bytes)

13. [CQ-Contest] ARRL 10 Meter Not-In-Log (score: 1)
Author: jono@enteract.com (Jon Ogden)
Date: Mon Aug 9 16:18:56 1999
Technically, speaking, Trey I think you are correct. It is incumbent upon BOTH stations to make sure that ALL info is correctly logged. However, in such a case as I get your call right, but you don't
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/1999-08/msg00337.html (9,334 bytes)

14. [CQ-Contest] ARRL 10 Meter Not-In-Log (score: 1)
Author: bhorn@hornucopia.com (Bruce Horn)
Date: Mon Aug 9 21:44:52 1999
Some comments on log checking: ZL1ANJ's example 1: The task for the log checking software and human log checker in this case is to decide whether K1TTT worked ZL1ANJ, but miss-copied the call sign, o
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/1999-08/msg00338.html (11,469 bytes)

15. [CQ-Contest] ARRL 10 Meter Not-In-Log (score: 1)
Author: KI9A@aol.com (KI9A@aol.com)
Date: Mon Aug 9 21:55:01 1999
<< According to what I know, you reported back the info correctly yet you typed it wrong.). I would argue in this general case that both stations should get zero points. IMHO, it's a bit, well, I dun
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/1999-08/msg00339.html (8,820 bytes)

16. [CQ-Contest] ARRL 10 Meter Not-In-Log (score: 1)
Author: roberto.soro@sia.it (Soro Roberto)
Date: Tue Aug 10 13:27:28 1999
Here it is very hard to understand how a station that report 599 1008 could be unique!! 1007 other people should have worked that guy in the contest and none of them sent in the log! If this is the c
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/1999-08/msg00341.html (8,585 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu