Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+ARRL\s+DX\s+Contest\s+exchange\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+ARRL\s+DX\s+Contest\s+exchange\s*$/: 24 ]

Total 24 documents matching your query.

21. [CQ-Contest] ARRL DX Contest exchange (score: 1): Author: w7why@harborside.com (Tom Osborne); Date: Sun Aug 22 02:37:08 1999; Hi Doug. What do you think we have now? The CQWW might as well not even have an exchange. Just type in a callsign and the computer fills in the rest. As far as all the other exchanges, the 599 is red; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1999-08/msg00427.html (9,091 bytes)
22. [CQ-Contest] ARRL DX Contest exchange (score: 1): Author: k6km@cncnet.com (Bill Snider); Date: Sun Aug 22 07:34:08 1999; Regarding the proposed (and undisclosed) changes in the ARRL DX contest exchanges, wouldn't it be appropriate to know the purpose of the proposed changes? If we know what them dudes want to accomplis; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1999-08/msg00431.html (8,279 bytes)
23. Fw: [CQ-Contest] ARRL DX Contest exchange (score: 1): Author: ua9cdc@dialup.mplik.ru (Igor Sokolov); Date: Mon Aug 23 11:05:10 1999; ARRL is not WW contest and that is the problem... We here in Asiatic Russia have nothing to do in ARRL being so much dependent on propagation over the North Pole. If it were WW with say extra NA mul; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1999-08/msg00437.html (8,289 bytes)
24. [CQ-Contest] ARRL DX Contest Exchange (score: 1): Author: aa7bg@3rivers.net (Matt--K7BG); Date: Tue Aug 24 20:34:07 1999; That's a good point alrighty. What was that thread just passed about the "honorable" stature that ragchewing seems to enjoy? I guess the proposed changes in length and "difficulty" of contest exchan; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1999-08/msg00462.html (9,170 bytes)

Current List: 21 - 24
Page: [1] [2]