Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+ARRL\s+RTTY\s+Roundup\s+\"assisted\"\s+class\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+ARRL\s+RTTY\s+Roundup\s+\"assisted\"\s+class\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] ARRL RTTY Roundup "assisted" class (score: 1): Author: wb0o@yahoo.com; Date: Mon, 30 Dec 2013 07:13:24 -0800 (PST); I see there is now an (A) class available to enter this weekend. What is the status of the US skimmers on RTTY? Will it be as fun as a CW (A) contest? 73, Bill KO7AA in Tucson (70 F and sunny in cas; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-12/msg00284.html (6,907 bytes)
2. Re: [CQ-Contest] ARRL RTTY Roundup "assisted" class (score: 1): Author: Mark <n2qt@yahoo.com>; Date: Mon, 30 Dec 2013 13:11:10 -0500; There just aren't as many rtty skimmers as for cw. Wz7i near Philadelphia is the best of the ones here. There are several in Europe which will help whenever they spot you. The rtty skimmer technology; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-12/msg00285.html (9,620 bytes)
3. Re: [CQ-Contest] ARRL RTTY Roundup "assisted" class (score: 1): Author: Pete Smith N4ZR <n4zr@contesting.com>; Date: Mon, 30 Dec 2013 13:15:52 -0500; Hi Bill - there are relatively few RTTY Skimmers in the US and Europe at this time, using the DL4RCK software, but the guys who are on are trying hard to make spots available. We're all hoping for mo; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-12/msg00286.html (8,251 bytes)
4. Re: [CQ-Contest] ARRL RTTY Roundup "assisted" class (score: 1): Author: "Shoppa, Tim" <tshoppa@wmata.com>; Date: Mon, 30 Dec 2013 19:57:26 +0000; CW Skimming is very effective right now; I can almost always get a higher rate in the first half of a CW test, if I click and work spots rather than CQ'ing. Only after that slows down do I switch to; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-12/msg00290.html (8,995 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]