Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+ARRL\s+rule\s+\-\s+A\s+practical\s+compromise\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+ARRL\s+rule\s+\-\s+A\s+practical\s+compromise\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [CQ-Contest] ARRL rule - A practical compromise (score: 1): Author: N1MM <tfwagner@snet.net>; Date: Fri, 07 Mar 2008 07:11:58 -0500; Why not ask the ARRL to enforce the rule for the 50 most needed DXCC entities and waive it for the rest? The contest sponsors could omit the logs from the same entities. Or they could just remove the; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-03/msg00170.html (8,573 bytes)
2. Re: [CQ-Contest] ARRL rule - A practical compromise (score: 1): Author: "VE5ZX" <ve5zx@hotmail.com>; Date: Fri, 7 Mar 2008 11:23:51 -0600; This is not a viable option. Tampering with the logs in any manner reduces or completely eliminates their usefulness for research or for the development of new adjudication software tools. Best to l; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-03/msg00174.html (9,481 bytes)
3. Re: [CQ-Contest] ARRL rule - A practical compromise (score: 1): Author: "Glenn VA3DX" <va3dx@sympatico.ca>; Date: Fri, 7 Mar 2008 10:34:42 -0500; Whose 50 most needed do we use ? Glenn va3dx _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-03/msg00175.html (9,345 bytes)
4. Re: [CQ-Contest] ARRL rule - A practical compromise (score: 1): Author: "David Robbins K1TTT" <k1ttt@arrl.net>; Date: Fri, 07 Mar 2008 18:38:58 +0000; No, don't butcher the logs that way... the rule says ALL the log information, so remove the exchanges, those are worthless anyway as per most other threads on here. Leave the times as those are impor; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-03/msg00177.html (10,577 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]