Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+ARRL\s+vs\.\s+CONTESTERS\s+$II$\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+ARRL\s+vs\.\s+CONTESTERS\s+$II$\s*$/: 1 ]

Total 1 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] ARRL vs. CONTESTERS (II) (score: 1): Author: kq2m@mags.net (Robert Shohet); Date: Sat Jan 12 13:17:59 2002; ARRL vs. Contesters (continued) I say this is no surprise because for years the ARRL de facto policy has been anti-contest. For years the ARRL has been reducing the pages and editorial content devote; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-01/msg00244.html (14,496 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 1
Page: [1]