Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+ARRLDX\s+Single\s+Operator\s+Records\s+have\s+been\s+Eliminated\!\s*$/: 13 ]

Total 13 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] ARRLDX Single Operator Records have been Eliminated! (score: 1)
Author: kq2m@kq2m.com
Date: Sat, 25 Feb 2023 08:52:14 -0600
Last week I was noticed that my single band ARRLDX contest records and those of my fellow contesters had been "disappeared", and I suspected that they were eliminated because now self-spotting was al
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2023-02/msg00080.html (9,552 bytes)

2. Re: [CQ-Contest] ARRLDX Single Operator Records have been Eliminated! (score: 1)
Author: Randy Thompson <k5zd@outlook.com>
Date: Sun, 26 Feb 2023 14:44:26 +0000
Do we know if they were purposefully deleted? ARRL is not the best at maintaining anything on the web. Have you written to ARRL to ask? Seems like that would be a good starting point. Depending on th
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2023-02/msg00082.html (10,811 bytes)

3. Re: [CQ-Contest] ARRLDX Single Operator Records have been Eliminated! (score: 1)
Author: Paul Bourque <pbourque@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 26 Feb 2023 10:02:24 -0500
Good morning, The old records will be preserved. The disappearance of the old records was an unintentional side effect of the addition of the new single band categories. We are working in correcting
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2023-02/msg00083.html (13,415 bytes)

4. Re: [CQ-Contest] ARRLDX Single Operator Records have been Eliminated! (score: 1)
Author: Paul Bourque <pbourque@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 26 Feb 2023 10:05:34 -0500
By the way, the changes in the power levels and allowing self-spotting are in no way connected to this. It was the addition of the new single band categories. The old records will be preserved, and t
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2023-02/msg00084.html (11,328 bytes)

5. Re: [CQ-Contest] ARRLDX Single Operator Records have been Eliminated! (score: 1)
Author: Steve London <n2icarrl@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 26 Feb 2023 08:14:50 -0700
Why don't you talk to N1SFE or W9JJ @ ARRL and ask them ? I also suggest that you look up Hanlon's Razor. https://simple.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hanlon%27s_razor 73, Steve, N2IC __________________________
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2023-02/msg00085.html (11,329 bytes)

6. Re: [CQ-Contest] ARRLDX Single Operator Records have been Eliminated! (score: 1)
Author: <john@kk9a.com>
Date: Sun, 26 Feb 2023 11:16:13 -0500
There are still a few older records still showing on the ARRL DX Contest site but most record scores are from 2022. This has to be an error, Bob! It would be great if you could see all scores over th
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2023-02/msg00086.html (10,730 bytes)

7. Re: [CQ-Contest] ARRLDX Single Operator Records have been Eliminated! (score: 1)
Author: K3ZJ David Siddall <davek3zj@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 26 Feb 2023 11:20:13 -0500
I inquired about this last week, and W5OV immediately replied that this will be fixed once they move the contest site to a new platform within the next month. W5OV is the managing ARRL official and h
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2023-02/msg00087.html (11,631 bytes)

8. Re: [CQ-Contest] ARRLDX Single Operator Records have been Eliminated! (score: 1)
Author: Ron Notarius W3WN via CQ-Contest <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Date: Sun, 26 Feb 2023 11:59:23 -0500
With all due respect, why not find out from the ARRL why those records are now offline, before jumping to conclusions, and then criticizing based on assumptions? Im not saying that youre necessarily
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2023-02/msg00088.html (11,545 bytes)

9. Re: [CQ-Contest] ARRLDX Single Operator Records have been Eliminated! (score: 1)
Author: Edward Sawyer <EdwardS@advanced-conversion.com>
Date: Sun, 26 Feb 2023 17:26:19 +0000
Actually, for whatever reason, its only the Single Band Records. And since the self spotting change didn't occur until the 2023 contest series, it wouldn't be for that reason. Looks like a computer e
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2023-02/msg00089.html (8,935 bytes)

10. Re: [CQ-Contest] ARRLDX Single Operator Records have been Eliminated! (score: 1)
Author: K3ZJ David Siddall <davek3zj@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 26 Feb 2023 13:27:41 -0500
While ARRL gets this problem sorted, one can try to find records using the Wayback Machine. I found the U.S. records as of 2015. The oldest in this subset was 1982, so some records persist for quite
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2023-02/msg00090.html (12,418 bytes)

11. Re: [CQ-Contest] ARRLDX Single Operator Records have been Eliminated! (score: 1)
Author: kq2m@kq2m.com
Date: Sun, 26 Feb 2023 16:31:43 -0600
Thanks to K3ZJ for providing the link to the ARRLDXSSB records, and for anyone interested, if you substitute CW for SSB in the web address, you can also see the ARRLDXCW records as well as of 2015. R
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2023-02/msg00091.html (15,389 bytes)

12. Re: [CQ-Contest] ARRLDX Single Operator Records have been Eliminated! (score: 1)
Author: Chuck Dietz <w5prchuck@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 26 Feb 2023 16:41:52 -0600
I kinda like holding the 10 meter record all of a sudden. lol Chuck W5PR _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2023-02/msg00092.html (9,634 bytes)

13. Re: [CQ-Contest] ARRLDX Single Operator Records have been Eliminated! (score: 1)
Author: Paul Bourque <pbourque@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2023 05:04:16 -0500
I have replied in this thread explaining the situation previously. The single band records will be restored. With the new single band categories being introduced last year, the website needs to be up
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2023-02/msg00095.html (12,887 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu