Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Absurd\s+Rule\s+in\s+NAQP\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Absurd\s+Rule\s+in\s+NAQP\s*$/: 28 ]

Total 28 documents matching your query.

21. Re: [CQ-Contest] Absurd Rule in NAQP (score: 1): Author: Wes Jennings <wjennings2011@hotmail.com>; Date: Mon, 18 Jan 2016 15:09:47 +0000; ok .. now I ran multi on this one and could use spotting and did not use spotting. spotting up here does waste time most of the time as ya can not hear the station that is being spotted. a cw skimmer; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-01/msg00159.html (10,009 bytes)
22. Re: [CQ-Contest] Absurd Rule in NAQP (score: 1): Author: Tom Haavisto <kamham69@gmail.com>; Date: Mon, 18 Jan 2016 09:12:39 -0500; Hi Pete There is more to this than getting on and out of a pileup quickly. Assuming everyone followed - and was able to master your technique of getting in/out fast - before the pileup forms, that wo; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-01/msg00160.html (13,723 bytes)
23. [CQ-Contest] Absurd rule in NAQP (score: 1): Author: kr2q@optimum.net; Date: Mon, 18 Jan 2016 15:05:11 +0000 (GMT); Pete, First, let me congratulate you for continuing to spit into wind for so many go-arounds. I admire your stick-to-it-ness. Second, it is no mystery (at least to me) why you are getting so much opp; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-01/msg00161.html (9,772 bytes)
24. [CQ-Contest] Absurd Rule in NAQP (score: 1): Author: Jeff Clarke <ku8e@bellsouth.net>; Date: Mon, 18 Jan 2016 10:36:07 -0500; I like the NAQP because it's just about the only USA domestic contest that you can work stations on all bands. Unlike SS where you can make one contact. You can have fun even with a smaller station.; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-01/msg00162.html (7,148 bytes)
25. Re: [CQ-Contest] Absurd rule in NAQP (score: 1): Author: "Fco. Luis Delgadillo" <xe2b@outlook.com>; Date: Mon, 18 Jan 2016 16:40:21 +0000; I'm amazed for the "witch hunt" mode for a simple opinion of a well respected fellow contester. Is this the way to attract new blood? Back to my flames shield. Enviado desde mi Huawei de Telcel -- Me; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-01/msg00163.html (10,796 bytes)
26. Re: [CQ-Contest] Absurd Rule in NAQP (score: 1): Author: "Dave Hachadorian" <k6ll.dave@gmail.com>; Date: Mon, 18 Jan 2016 10:39:51 -0700; I think an assisted category should be added to the NAQP. Whenever I'm doing a manual S&P on CW or RTTY, I keep thinking of how inefficient the process is, compared to skimmers publicly broadcasting; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-01/msg00164.html (7,240 bytes)
27. Re: [CQ-Contest] Absurd Rule in NAQP (score: 1): Author: Gerry Hull <gerry@yccc.org>; Date: Mon, 18 Jan 2016 21:02:57 -0500; Thanks for that QSO, by the way, Tom! I made one, exactly one, QSO from VY1AAA in Phone NAQP. That's the consequence of "Boy and his radio" when people do not S&P. So, I found the Football games more; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-01/msg00165.html (11,947 bytes)
28. Re: [CQ-Contest] Absurd Rule in NAQP (score: 1): Author: "Stephen Bloom" <sbloom@acsalaska.net>; Date: Mon, 18 Jan 2016 22:02:56 -0900; Hi Gerry: Low power contests are a slog from the Northland ..no doubt about it ..especially on SSB ..but I am wondering what bands you were trying at what times? We had a couple of folks operating fr; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-01/msg00167.html (14,092 bytes)

Current List: 21 - 28
Page: [1] [2]