-- Original Message -- Sent: Wednesday, April 02, 2014 8:56 AM How about contest organizers publish as part of the general results a Top Ten box for Accuracy? We already have individual accuracy repo
An interesting idea. What is the accepted definition for calculating "accuracy"? Randy, K5ZD _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://l
The web edition of the Phone Sweepstakes writeup has been doing this for years. See, for example http://www.arrl.org/files/file/ContestResults/2012/2012-SSPH-Web-V2.pdf 73, Steve, N2IC How about cont
Hi everybody, SAC gives all logs checked to the last detail. My 2013 CW log: http://www.sactest.net/blog/result/ubn/2013/CW/OH0V%20CW.txt All North American logs available by clicking the entrant cal
Oh boy .. I scrolled down on the North American results. VE3DZ logged 427 Scandinavians using low power. Excellent ! K3TW stopped at exactly 73 QSOs as low power. Very nice way to say hello to everyb
Great idea! K4XS In a message dated 4/2/2014 5:20:18 P.M. Coordinated Universal Time, jrhadlock74@msn.com writes: -- Original Message -- Sent: Wednesday, April 02, 2014 8:56 AM How about contest orga
Its an interesting idea. Obviously this would have to be weighted by QSOs and/or other metrics to make it meaningful. I.e. a 100% accurate score is trivial with 10 QSOs, much harder with 5000 QSOs :)
An interesting idea. What is the accepted definition for calculating "accuracy"? (% correct calls + % correct exchanges)/2 ? Syl -VE5ZX _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mail
What is the accepted definition for calculating "accuracy"? I would guess: (calculated score from Cabrillo after NIL/bustedcalls/errors) divided by (calculated score from Cabrillo before reductions)
Maybe kind of Honor-Roll list, % of score reduction and UBNs.... We publish all these info for all participants in SCC Contests (EUHFC, SCC RTTY) See 2013 results as an example http://lea.hamradio.si
Since at least 2011, the ARRL has been publishing the top 5 accurate stations, in several USA & DX categories, for the ARRL DX CW and ARRL DX SSB contests in terms of lowest error rate. These are pub
So (1 + 1)/2 = 100% Makes zero sense since this is really a statistical problem and a simple average is meaningless - unless of course you just want to make one perfect QSO! 73, Steve W1SRD (% correc
Tree N6TR has published the Top Ten "Golden Logs" box in the CW Sprint Results for years.Rather than calculate percentages, he lists the ten largest logs that were error free. _______________________
I think making LCR reports public would discourage new contesters from participation. Dave N1IX Wouldn't making LCR reports public, on line, accomplish this? -- K1TN _________________________________
IMO we really could have the reports visible at least at the main % level for the largest scoring entrants. 73, Jukka OH6LI _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-
Author: Richard F DiDonna NN3W <richnn3w@verizon.net>
Date: Thu, 03 Apr 2014 15:27:35 -0400
I've got a couple suggestions. For any score that is within 50% of the top score in a major category, post the accuracy percentage. Don't do it publicly for scores that are below that percentage. Or
Why? There are plenty of long-time contesters with poor accuracy. Barry W2UP P.S. Are there any new contesters? Dave N1IX Wouldn't making LCR reports public, on line, accomplish this? -- K1TN _______
The purpose of presenting an "accuracy" measurement is motivation, right? Listing the top-accuracy-ops is supposed to motivate others to achieve that high level of accuracy, right? Making public the