Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Adding\s+MS\-DOS\s+to\s+a\s+WindowsXP\s+Computer\s*$/: 21 ]

Total 21 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [CQ-Contest] Adding MS-DOS to a WindowsXP Computer (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@copper.net>
Date: Fri, 01 Dec 2006 11:42:54 -0800
ORIGINAL MESSAGE: -- REPLY FOLLOWS -- What's wrong with the DOS that already comes with WinXP? In fact there are two versions: The original DOS and a version which handles long file names. Do they no
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-12/msg00040.html (7,467 bytes)

2. Re: [CQ-Contest] Adding MS-DOS to a WindowsXP Computer (score: 1)
Author: Mark Bailey <kd4d@comcast.net>
Date: Fri, 01 Dec 2006 14:52:07 -0500
Hi Bill: There is no DOS with XP (unless you mean the ability to create a recovery floppy and reboot with that?). WindowsXP offers the ability to open a "Command Prompt" window which will run some co
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-12/msg00042.html (8,856 bytes)

3. Re: [CQ-Contest] Adding MS-DOS to a WindowsXP Computer (score: 1)
Author: kb8nnu@yahoo.com
Date: Fri, 1 Dec 2006 11:57:03 -0800 (PST)
If I may add a quicker solution to the dos problem here... MS now offers their helpful Virtual PC (2004 SP1 and 2007 beta) software for free . This software allows the user to to run virtual computin
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-12/msg00043.html (9,920 bytes)

4. Re: [CQ-Contest] Adding MS-DOS to a WindowsXP Computer (score: 1)
Author: Doug Smith W9WI <w9wi@earthlink.net>
Date: 01 Dec 2006 16:17:52 -0600
No. I'm betting your DOS programs don't do things with the parallel port that Bill Gates didn't intend. (like sending CW) -- Doug Smith W9WI Pleasant View (Nashville), TN EM66 http://www.w9wi.com ___
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-12/msg00049.html (7,716 bytes)

5. Re: [CQ-Contest] Adding MS-DOS to a WindowsXP Computer (score: 1)
Author: "Leigh S. Jones" <leigh@j1s.us>
Date: Fri, 1 Dec 2006 15:14:27 -0800
Virtualizing software allows you to run an MSDOS program all right. So does an XP command window. And you're pretty well assured that you can make the basic logging functions work during a phone cont
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-12/msg00052.html (13,393 bytes)

6. Re: [CQ-Contest] Adding MS-DOS to a WindowsXP Computer (score: 1)
Author: "CW Sanders" <no5w@consolidated.net>
Date: Fri, 1 Dec 2006 19:33:46 -0600
If it is desired to stay with these DOS-based programs running under XP while continuing to produce great CW then it seems like a good solution would be for the developers of those programs to add th
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-12/msg00058.html (14,563 bytes)

7. Re: [CQ-Contest] Adding MS-DOS to a WindowsXP Computer (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@copper.net>
Date: Fri, 01 Dec 2006 19:30:31 -0800
ORIGINAL MESSAGE: -- REPLY FOLLOWS -- Ok, if you say so. I run a number of DOS programs such as G4FGQ's suite of calculator programs and K6STI's coil.exe and maybe a few others. None of them require
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-12/msg00059.html (8,208 bytes)

8. Re: [CQ-Contest] Adding MS-DOS to a WindowsXP Computer (score: 1)
Author: "Dave Hachadorian" <K6LL@adelphia.net>
Date: Sat, 2 Dec 2006 04:09:35 -0000
Take the old dos hd out of your 486, and put it in the xp machine. Make it the master (hdd0). Make the big xp hd the slave (hdd1). Set bios to boot to hdd1. On those rare occurrences where you want t
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-12/msg00061.html (7,960 bytes)

9. Re: [CQ-Contest] Adding MS-DOS to a WindowsXP Computer (score: 1)
Author: Gerry Treas <k8gt@twmi.rr.com>
Date: Sat, 02 Dec 2006 01:17:58 -0500
And why in Blue Blazes would you want to run Linux under Windoze? That would be like putting a Ferrari body on a Yugo! Running a DOS environment under XP still won't give you hardware access to your
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-12/msg00066.html (12,237 bytes)

10. Re: [CQ-Contest] Adding MS-DOS to a WindowsXP Computer (score: 1)
Author: "Paul Pescitelli" <dx.k4uj@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 2 Dec 2006 09:09:36 -0500
Forget the old DOS programs and upgrade to WinTest with WinKey. Just like DOS version of CT, but in a Windows app. Sure it costs a little $$ but well worth it. Paul K4UJ _____________________________
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-12/msg00075.html (16,969 bytes)

11. Re: [CQ-Contest] Adding MS-DOS to a WindowsXP Computer (score: 1)
Author: kd4d@comcast.net
Date: Sat, 02 Dec 2006 17:15:07 +0000
Hi Dave: This works really well. There are simple, reliable boot loading programs (like GAG from gag.sourceforge.net) that make selecting which hard drive gets booted MUCH easier than using the BIOS.
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-12/msg00078.html (8,926 bytes)

12. Re: [CQ-Contest] Adding MS-DOS to a WindowsXP Computer (score: 1)
Author: "Julio VE3FH" <ve3fh@rac.ca>
Date: Sat, 2 Dec 2006 14:09:17 -0500
Is it possible that the ability to run MS-DOS programs from within XP varies from one installation and/or version to another? I am asking because I use a couple of very old MS-DOS programs under Wind
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-12/msg00089.html (9,207 bytes)

13. Re: [CQ-Contest] Adding MS-DOS to a WindowsXP Computer (score: 1)
Author: "Ted Bryant" <w4nz@comcast.net>
Date: Sat, 2 Dec 2006 15:50:57 -0500
Forget DOS... and forget paying. Download and install N1MM Logger, a fully featured Windows app that lets you use many of your favorite keystroke combinations whether it's CT, NA or TR. Works great w
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-12/msg00099.html (18,502 bytes)

14. Re: [CQ-Contest] Adding MS-DOS to a WindowsXP Computer (score: 1)
Author: <w9wi@w9wi.com>
Date: Sat, 02 Dec 2006 20:00:58 -0500
I *think* I've successfully run Procomm Plus/DOS under Windows XP. The difference, however, is that PC+ uses the COM ports the way they were intended. Handshaking leads were used only for handshaking
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-12/msg00104.html (8,442 bytes)

15. Re: [CQ-Contest] Adding MS-DOS to a WindowsXP Computer (score: 1)
Author: steve.root@culligan4water.com
Date: Sun, 03 Dec 2006 13:59:06 +0000
We need to upgrade the PC used at W0ZT's, so I've been following this thread with some interest. I just wonder why it seems so important to run XP. Given: - N1MM, DX4WIN, WL, etc. all are supported o
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-12/msg00111.html (8,699 bytes)

16. [CQ-Contest] Adding MS-DOS to a WindowsXP Computer (score: 1)
Author: Dennis OConnor <ad4hk2004@yahoo.com>
Date: Sun, 3 Dec 2006 06:34:12 -0800 (PST)
DOS based machines and software are getting long in the tooth... I have long used and liked TRLOG, but it does not run on my XP machines, and installing 4 port serial cards on newer hardware is incre
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-12/msg00112.html (7,936 bytes)

17. Re: [CQ-Contest] Adding MS-DOS to a WindowsXP Computer (score: 1)
Author: kb8nnu@yahoo.com
Date: Sun, 3 Dec 2006 06:56:24 -0800 (PST)
Steve...The main issue today is most computers are loaded with XP or soon to be Vista after the first of the year. I agree about the 98 machines working just fine for TR and the such, BUT as with the
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-12/msg00113.html (10,301 bytes)

18. Re: [CQ-Contest] Adding MS-DOS to a WindowsXP Computer (score: 1)
Author: "Paul Pescitelli" <dx.k4uj@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 3 Dec 2006 10:07:32 -0500
1) It is an unsupported operating system 2) It does not have a viable kernel to mutitask. 3) It is Virus and hacker prone 4) It doesn't support all the new technology, try finding drivers for some of
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-12/msg00114.html (10,279 bytes)

19. Re: [CQ-Contest] Adding MS-DOS to a WindowsXP Computer (score: 1)
Author: "Jim Callow" <jcallow@k8ir.com>
Date: Sun, 3 Dec 2006 08:58:26 -0600
I had dual-boot (actually quad-boot) on my main computer until the motherboard died last summer. The new AMD 64 board doesn't have WIN98 drivers, so I went straight XP on it. I picked up a Dell PIII
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-12/msg00116.html (10,792 bytes)

20. Re: [CQ-Contest] Adding MS-DOS to a WindowsXP Computer (score: 1)
Author: "w4ZW" <w4zw@comcast.net>
Date: Sun, 3 Dec 2006 11:28:11 -0500
Same here. Love TRLOG, and ran it for many years on a WIN95 and then a WIN98 machine without any problems, but all my systems are now XP Pro, and N1MM is pretty slick, and with the EL keyer, sends go
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-12/msg00117.html (9,567 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu