Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+An\s+Examination\s+of\s+K1TTT\'s\s+Reports\s*$/: 7 ]

Total 7 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] An Examination of K1TTT's Reports (score: 1)
Author: "David Kopacz" <david.kopacz@aspwebhosting.com>
Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2009 17:27:37 -0500
I have argued that these incidences should be reported to the contest sponsor and handled privately between the sponsor and the individual being reported. I have also argued that many of the people s
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-03/msg00254.html (15,673 bytes)

2. Re: [CQ-Contest] An Examination of K1TTT's Reports (score: 1)
Author: "Eric Hilding" <b38@hilding.com>
Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2009 20:51:29 -0700
My personal opinion is that the K3LR and W3LPL teams (as well as most others) participate in the cluster postings in the same spirit of 'friendly competition' that can ultimately lead to more QSO an
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-03/msg00260.html (8,708 bytes)

3. Re: [CQ-Contest] An Examination of K1TTT's Reports (score: 1)
Author: "K1TTT" <K1TTT@ARRL.NET>
Date: Sat, 14 Mar 2009 12:51:42 +0000
They are, and maybe the sponsors do, but we never hear about it directly... and it is most likely a long time after the fact, if ever. This section is often a lead in to other cases further down the
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-03/msg00263.html (19,572 bytes)

4. Re: [CQ-Contest] An Examination of K1TTT's Reports (score: 1)
Author: "Edward" <sawyered@earthlink.net>
Date: Sat, 14 Mar 2009 08:47:57 -0400
I could not disagree more with KV1Y's post. I for one think the service that David K1TTT provides to the contesting community is enormous and greatly appreciated. The number of people around the worl
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-03/msg00265.html (9,131 bytes)

5. Re: [CQ-Contest] An Examination of K1TTT's Reports (score: 1)
Author: "Robert Naumann" <w5ov@w5ov.com>
Date: Sat, 14 Mar 2009 09:21:41 -0500
The bottom-line issue here has to do with "sportsmanship" and understanding the true meaning of certain words and phrases being used in this discussion. As was said during the recent U.S. presidentia
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-03/msg00268.html (11,257 bytes)

6. Re: [CQ-Contest] An Examination of K1TTT's Reports (score: 1)
Author: "W0MU Mike Fatchett" <w0mu@w0mu.com>
Date: Sat, 14 Mar 2009 08:30:20 -0600
Pretty simple. If nobody spots, then there are no spots. More spots encourages more spots. Spots help competitors in all classes and those not competing. I don't spot stations that I need for a mult
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-03/msg00271.html (9,905 bytes)

7. Re: [CQ-Contest] An Examination of K1TTT's Reports (score: 1)
Author: "K0HB" <kzerohb@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 14 Mar 2009 15:51:47 -0500
OO's don't issue public reports. They issue private notices. In extreme cases they involve the regulators. I think everyone (or at least most of us) think that K1TTT's investigations would be useful
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-03/msg00281.html (8,254 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu