Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+An\s+attempt\s+at\s+a\s+foundational\s+understanding\[was\:Icansee\s+the\s+difference\.\.\.\]\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+An\s+attempt\s+at\s+a\s+foundational\s+understanding\[was\:Icansee\s+the\s+difference\.\.\.\]\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [CQ-Contest] An attempt at a foundational understanding[was:Icansee the difference...] (score: 1): Author: "Robert Naumann" <w5ov@w5ov.com>; Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2006 20:41:57 -0600; Ev, While what Tom said is true, your interpretation of it seems to be that submitting a log is risky due to the slippery slope of adjudication variance. Since different people see things different w; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-12/msg00360.html (9,981 bytes)
2. Re: [CQ-Contest] An attempt at a foundational understanding[was:Icansee the difference...] (score: 1): Author: "Paul J. Piercey" <p.piercey@nl.rogers.com>; Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2006 03:31:44 -0000; Yep, seems to prove my point. If the rules are nothing more than one's own interpretation of them, and this interpretation has been reinforced by them having been enforced (or not) in a haphazard ma; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-12/msg00362.html (10,029 bytes)
3. Re: [CQ-Contest] An attempt at a foundational understanding[was:Icansee the difference...] (score: 1): Author: Ev Tupis <w2ev@yahoo.com>; Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2006 03:25:47 -0800 (PST); -- Original Message -- Since different people see things different ways, as Tom said, you may see one person's interpretation of the rules impact the adjudication of contests during that person's ten; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-12/msg00366.html (8,626 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]