Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Angle\s+of\s+received\s+signal\s+QUERY\s*$/: 6 ]

Total 6 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] Angle of received signal QUERY (score: 1)
Author: "Tony Rogozinski" <trogo@telegraphy.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2008 11:44:40 -0500
I am trying to determine what would be the lowest angle from which one could expect to receive DX signals? It seems that at one time I read 5 degrees but I've done some research and can't find the an
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-08/msg00134.html (8,230 bytes)

2. Re: [CQ-Contest] Angle of received signal QUERY (score: 1)
Author: "Dave Hachadorian" <K6LL@ARRL.net>
Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2008 10:38:43 -0700
There's not really a simple answer to this question. The best method of analysis would be to use the program HFTA, which comes with the ARRL Antenna book. Here's a link to the manual: http://www.arrl
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-08/msg00138.html (9,160 bytes)

3. Re: [CQ-Contest] Angle of received signal QUERY (score: 1)
Author: Steve London <n2icarrl@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2008 12:22:34 -0600
There's no easy answer to this. I went through the same exercise before I bought this QTH. Just some more questions: - What direction is the hill ? Is it an important contest direction that you would
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-08/msg00139.html (9,608 bytes)

4. Re: [CQ-Contest] Angle of received signal QUERY (score: 1)
Author: "Peter Voelpel" <df3kv@t-online.de>
Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2008 20:41:17 +0200
Hi Tony, It all will depend on the height of yor planned antennas. As long they will not produce useful low angle radiation below 6° those 5.8°degrees will do no harm anyway. Best is to simulate it w
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-08/msg00141.html (9,094 bytes)

5. Re: [CQ-Contest] Angle of received signal QUERY (score: 1)
Author: David Gilbert <xdavid@cis-broadband.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2008 12:37:48 -0700
Hi, Tony. The optimum angle (takeoff or reception) for signals is a function of your latitude/longitude, the particular path you are trying to work, and the magnitude of solar flux. N6BV ran tons of
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-08/msg00143.html (11,006 bytes)

6. Re: [CQ-Contest] Angle of received signal QUERY (score: 1)
Author: "Renner, PY7RP" <py7rp@yahoo.com.br>
Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2008 13:27:21 -0700 (PDT)
Hello,   That is an interesting question. I saw sometime ago on PJ2Tīs website (http://www.pj2t.org/) some information about the height that the antenna should be to be more efficient regarding the d
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-08/msg00146.html (11,300 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu