Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Announcing\s+the\s+World\s+Wide\s+Digi\s+DX\s+Contest\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] Announcing the World Wide Digi DX Contest (score: 1)
Author: "Tim Duffy" <k3lr@k3lr.com>
Date: Sat, 29 Jun 2019 13:24:37 -0400
Announcing the World Wide Digi DX Contest For immediate release. June 29, 2019. The World Wide Radio Operators Foundation ("WWROF"), in collaboration with the Slovenia Contest Club ("SCC"), is please
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2019-06/msg00137.html (10,218 bytes)

2. Re: [CQ-Contest] Announcing the World Wide Digi DX Contest (score: 1)
Author: ktfrog007--- via CQ-Contest <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Date: Tue, 9 Jul 2019 21:19:38 +0000 (UTC)
Hi, Just looking to understand the following from the World Wide Digi DX Contest rules:  14. Multi-streamed QSOs are permitted, but limited to no more than 3 QSOs conducted simultaneously on a single
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2019-07/msg00026.html (11,506 bytes)

3. Re: [CQ-Contest] Announcing the World Wide Digi DX Contest (score: 1)
Author: Edward Sawyer <EdwardS@sbelectronics.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2019 06:37:26 -0400
That sounds like a pandora's box of software management and enforcement to me. Why a 3 QSO limit, just let it rip, its digital and all is good right? Ed N1UR Hi, Just looking to understand the follow
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2019-07/msg00028.html (12,514 bytes)

4. Re: [CQ-Contest] Announcing the World Wide Digi DX Contest (score: 1)
Author: Michael Adams <mda@n1en.org>
Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2019 13:16:49 +0000
I assume that they're trying to strike a balance between "it's digital, so why not play with the possibilities" and "occupying too much spectrum is poor sportsmanship". -- Michael Adams | mda@n1en.or
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2019-07/msg00029.html (8,286 bytes)

5. Re: [CQ-Contest] Announcing the World Wide Digi DX Contest (score: 1)
Author: "Ed Muns" <ed@w0yk.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2019 07:28:25 -0700
Hi Ken. Good question and there are many more about the new WW Digi contest. The website (ww-digi.com <http://www.ww-digi.com> ) is an evolving source of answers. The best email list for discussion o
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2019-07/msg00030.html (13,599 bytes)

6. Re: [CQ-Contest] Announcing the World Wide Digi DX Contest (score: 1)
Author: "Ed Muns" <ed@w0yk.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2019 07:48:34 -0700
Hi Ed. The RTTYdigital@groups.io email list is probably a better place for discussion of RTTY and other digital mode-specific topics. For more information on the WW Digi contest, ww-digi.com is an ex
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2019-07/msg00031.html (14,332 bytes)

7. Re: [CQ-Contest] Announcing the World Wide Digi DX Contest (score: 1)
Author: "rjairam@gmail.com" <rjairam@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2019 13:57:20 -0400
The 3 QSO limit is also a limitation of the MSHV software. It's like 100 and 150 watts being categorized as low power - it matched what transceivers are/were capable of. You should be happy. You want
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2019-07/msg00032.html (15,889 bytes)

8. Re: [CQ-Contest] Announcing the World Wide Digi DX Contest (score: 1)
Author: Edward Sawyer <EdwardS@sbelectronics.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2019 14:02:16 -0400
Actually, no sarcasm intended. I guess I am thinking that F/H mode is up to 5 streams so why limit that to 3. Surely, some nice DX will be on and want to utilize that to its full extent. I am very ha
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2019-07/msg00033.html (16,424 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu