Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Annoying\s+trend\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Annoying\s+trend\s*$/: 36 ]

Total 36 documents matching your query.

21. Re: [CQ-Contest] Annoying trend (score: 1): Author: John Geiger <johngeig@yahoo.com>; Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2007 18:25:06 -0800 (PST); Then why not state in the rules: Check (the last two digits made up at random) It seems pretty straightforward what the check is. I cannot see why some people are so resistant to sending the correct; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-01/msg00285.html (9,949 bytes)
22. Re: [CQ-Contest] Annoying trend (score: 1): Author: KI9A@aol.com; Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2007 21:41:54 EST; Amen! Perhaps contest sponsors should deduct points for busted qsos based on the signal report passed out. If the guy was really Readability 5, and you blew it, you must be pretty dumb, so deduct 5 q; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-01/msg00286.html (8,196 bytes)
23. Re: [CQ-Contest] Annoying trend (score: 1): Author: John Geiger <johngeig@yahoo.com>; Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2007 20:36:29 -0800 (PST); As I stated before, the RST is purely subjective. R of 5 means perfectly reabable, whatever that means. And S9 means "extremely strong signals", but compared to what? There is no standard for strong; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-01/msg00287.html (10,474 bytes)
24. Re: [CQ-Contest] Annoying trend (score: 1): Author: "John Vickers" <wa4tt@nlamerica.com>; Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2007 00:09:16 -0500; I cannot see why some people are so resistant to logging whats actually sent. 73, WA4TT _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-01/msg00288.html (8,627 bytes)
25. Re: [CQ-Contest] Annoying trend (score: 1): Author: "Tom Wagner" <tfwagner@snet.net>; Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2007 06:26:51 -0500; Re check digits and other "unenforced rules"... To understand why the ARRL doesn't enforce the check digit "rule", put yourself in their position. Some contest newbie submits his score with the wrong; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-01/msg00291.html (10,211 bytes)
26. Re: [CQ-Contest] Annoying trend (score: 1): Author: "Barry Merrill" <barry@mxg.com>; Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2007 07:28:05 -0600; I saw the goodness of SGP when operating WPX SSB last year as EI/W5GN with lousy antenna and low power, and the challenge to the European operators for whom English was a second language, struggling; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-01/msg00293.html (7,991 bytes)
27. Re: [CQ-Contest] Annoying trend (score: 1): Author: John Geiger <johngeig@yahoo.com>; Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2007 07:39:01 -0800 (PST); So instead of sending a consectutive serial number, which can take more time in sending, would it be ok for me to give everyone 100 as a serial number, cut to ATT? As long as I log that as the sent n; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-01/msg00294.html (10,033 bytes)
28. Re: [CQ-Contest] Annoying trend (score: 1): Author: "Mike Fatchett" <mike@mallardcove.com>; Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2007 09:32:09 -0700; The ARRL requires that the DX stations send their power in the ARRL DX CW and SSB contests. It does not say to what degree of accuracy does it? So under this thought process everyone who sends KW tha; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-01/msg00295.html (12,202 bytes)
29. Re: [CQ-Contest] Annoying trend (score: 1): Author: "Paul J. Piercey" <p.piercey@nl.rogers.com>; Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2007 17:49:48 -0000; Why is this being picked apart again? Items in brackets are sometimes considered to be an example of the main point of the encompassing sentence. So, in rule 4.4 below, there is to be check variable; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-01/msg00300.html (12,297 bytes)
30. Re: [CQ-Contest] Annoying trend (score: 1): Author: "Paul J. Piercey" <p.piercey@nl.rogers.com>; Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2007 22:33:12 -0000; Wow. All the rules I have seen for contests using serial numbers as part of the exchange stipulate "consecutive" or "progressive" serial numbers. That is a defined rule. 73 -- Paul VO1HE ___________; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-01/msg00308.html (10,674 bytes)
31. Re: [CQ-Contest] Annoying Trend (score: 1): Author: K6VVA LQP HQ <dx35@hilding.com>; Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2007 18:24:06 -0800; I cannot see why the ARRL is "so resistant" to revising the rules to read either: 1. "You may use any CK other than your actual first year licensed"; OR, 2. "If you use any CK other than your actual; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-01/msg00310.html (8,912 bytes)
32. Re: [CQ-Contest] Annoying Trend (score: 1): Author: "Kelly Taylor" <ve4xt@mts.net>; Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2007 19:53:22 -0600; The League isn't going to change the rules because the League just doesn't see this as an issue worth spending an iota of time worrying about. Neither do I. Next subject please. And let's make it som; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-01/msg00312.html (9,738 bytes)
33. Re: [CQ-Contest] Annoying Trend (score: 1): Author: Zack Widup <w9sz@prairienet.org>; Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2007 22:15:16 -0600 (CST); Hey, this is supposed to be fun. Remember what fun is? You folks are taking it way too seriously. 73, Zack W9SZ _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@cont; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-01/msg00316.html (9,503 bytes)
34. Re: [CQ-Contest] Annoying Trend (score: 1): Author: George Fremin III <geoiii@kkn.net>; Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2007 20:49:48 -0800; The real "no brainer" here is that what diffrence does it make what someone sends for their check? Excuse me if I have come in in the middle of some thread I have not read yet - but this sounds like; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-01/msg00317.html (9,286 bytes)
35. Re: [CQ-Contest] Annoying trend (score: 1): Author: "Rick Tavan N6XI" <rtavan@gmail.com>; Date: Sun, 28 Jan 2007 10:35:38 -0800; I use a pre-fill DB as a keystroke saver and reasonableness checker. If a discrepancy is such that there is reasonable doubt, I'll ask. For example, unless I know you're sending with a computer, I'll; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-01/msg00335.html (10,308 bytes)
36. Re: [CQ-Contest] Annoying trend (score: 1): Author: Ev Tupis <w2ev@yahoo.com>; Date: Sun, 28 Jan 2007 12:37:11 -0800 (PST); This is *really* funny. It reminds me of the people that listen to their automobile GPS's when they say "turn left here" and end up driving on to somone's lawn. <giggle> Rick said, "I don't see anyt; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-01/msg00336.html (8,982 bytes)

Current List: 21 - 36
Page: [1] [2]