Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Are\s+you\s+kidding\s+me\s+$AC0C\s+comments$\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Are\s+you\s+kidding\s+me\s+$AC0C\s+comments$\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] Are you kidding me (AC0C comments) (score: 1): Author: Douglas Zwiebel <dougzzz@gmail.com>; Date: Sat, 21 Nov 2020 16:19:27 -0500; Jeff notes that RTTY WPX has no separate unassisted category. Perhaps (maybe?) the answer is in the rules. Look at WPX Rule IX.2 (QSO alerting...) definition SNIP The use of any technology that provi; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2020-11/msg00247.html (7,201 bytes)
2. Re: [CQ-Contest] Are you kidding me (AC0C comments) (score: 1): Author: Jeff Blaine <KeepWalking188@ac0c.com>; Date: Sat, 21 Nov 2020 18:11:35 -0600; In the RU and the CQ DX, there are seperate specific categories. Here's how the CQ WW DX contest lists it: *2. QSO finding assistance:* The use of any technology or other source that provides call si; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2020-11/msg00248.html (11,173 bytes)
3. Re: [CQ-Contest] Are you kidding me (AC0C comments) (score: 1): Author: john@kk9a.com; Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2020 08:50:20 -0600; There are non-assisted categories in CQWW RTTY so using a RTTY decoder should be excluded from the QSO alerting definition. The WPX RTTY rules are still different from the new "aligned with RTTY" Pho; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2020-11/msg00250.html (8,112 bytes)
4. [CQ-Contest] Are you kidding me (AC0C comments) (score: 1): Author: James Cain <jamesdavidcain@gmail.com>; Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2020 18:36:29 +0000; I can see it now! In CW contests we will be required to begin every exchange with "Please copy" (sent in Morse, of course). This will "align" CW contests with phone contests. Just one more step in th; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2020-11/msg00252.html (8,578 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]