Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+B\-Low\s+1\.835\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+B\-Low\s+1\.835\?\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] B-Low 1.835? (score: 1): Author: K5NZ@aol.com (K5NZ@aol.com); Date: Sat Feb 23 11:33:05 2002; --part1_fb.221441f7.29a91e41_boundary Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Ok guys, what is the final word on operating SSB below 1.835? I played around to giv; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-02/msg00368.html (7,475 bytes)
2. [CQ-Contest] B-Low 1.835? (score: 1): Author: k4ik@subich.com (Joe Subich, K4IK); Date: Sat Feb 23 22:33:04 2002; The ARRL bandplan calls for keeping SSB above 1843, not 1835. The US stations don't belong below 1843 on SSB. Unfortunately, there have been several well known contest US contest ops flouting the ban; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-02/msg00375.html (7,376 bytes)
3. [CQ-Contest] B-Low 1.835? (score: 1): Author: kc5ajx@hotmail.com (Rick Bullon); Date: Sun Feb 24 07:57:18 2002; Below is a copy of an email I sent to Mr Hollingsworth after the posting on the ARRL web site of the letter sent by Mr Hollingsworth to K3NM and the proposal of making the ARRL band plan a rule. Mr H; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-02/msg00380.html (10,926 bytes)
4. [CQ-Contest] B-Low 1.835? (score: 1): Author: w2up@mindspring.com (Barry ); Date: Sun Feb 24 13:01:49 2002; Yeah, it was real nice last night having all the SSB QRM covering up PW0T on 1814 CW. Prime offender was S57M CQing, but a bunch of stateside guys kept calling him. Barry -- Barry Kutner, W2UP Intern; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-02/msg00382.html (8,435 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]