Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+BOGUS\s+QSO\s+RATES\!\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+BOGUS\s+QSO\s+RATES\!\s*$/: 27 ]

Total 27 documents matching your query.

21. Re: [CQ-Contest] BOGUS QSO RATES! (score: 1): Author: Jeff Steinman <n5tj@hotmail.com>; Date: Tue, 8 Nov 2011 17:48:58 -0600; Interesting topic and angles. I can confirm that I *do not* send my call after each QSO during big hours. When working as many as 8-10 people in a minute on SSB there's no time/reason to sign each Q; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-11/msg00139.html (10,472 bytes)
22. Re: [CQ-Contest] BOGUS QSO RATES! (score: 1): Author: "Bob Naumann" <W5OV@W5OV.COM>; Date: Wed, 9 Nov 2011 06:35:03 -0600; Jeff, As the method you apply here is one based on your greater than average skill set and experience, what would you recommend for someone who is not blessed with the same or just starting out? I do; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-11/msg00163.html (13,574 bytes)
23. Re: [CQ-Contest] BOGUS QSO RATES! (score: 1): Author: George Fremin III <geoiii@kkn.net>; Date: Wed, 9 Nov 2011 07:26:36 -0800; I am not Jeff - but I will give some thoughts on this topic. First I will say that much of what we have been talking about is not something that most folks "just starting out" would have to worry abo; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-11/msg00167.html (12,763 bytes)
24. Re: [CQ-Contest] BOGUS QSO RATES! (score: 1): Author: George Fremin III <geoiii@kkn.net>; Date: Wed, 9 Nov 2011 07:33:20 -0800; One of the ways that some ops squeeze a few more contacts into an hour is to not always use phonetics. They will do this: pile: Whiskey Mike 5 Radio op: WM5R 59 4 And they will do this over and over; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-11/msg00168.html (9,189 bytes)
25. Re: [CQ-Contest] BOGUS QSO RATES! (score: 1): Author: Mark Bailey <kd4d@comcast.net>; Date: Wed, 09 Nov 2011 09:15:12 -0500; Hi Jeff: QRZ takes way too long to send or say IMHO. Try "Thanks" (or TU on CW) and, maybe "Roger" (R on CW)if you want a different acknowledgement when you don't send the call. You can say many call; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-11/msg00171.html (15,256 bytes)
26. Re: [CQ-Contest] BOGUS QSO RATES! (score: 1): Author: K1AR@aol.com; Date: Wed, 9 Nov 2011 11:14:21 -0500 (EST); Mark, The posting of constructive operating tips that yield on-air improvements will not be tolerated on this reflector. Please revert back to our well-established mission of incessant whining, name; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-11/msg00174.html (14,536 bytes)
27. Re: [CQ-Contest] BOGUS QSO RATES! (score: 1): Author: Gerry Hull <gerry@yccc.org>; Date: Wed, 9 Nov 2011 11:55:37 -0500; Of course, I use non-phonetics as well. It's a great technique. The problem occurs when the op on the other end does not recognize their own callsign when not spoken in phonetics (it happens!). Non-p; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-11/msg00192.html (10,932 bytes)

Current List: 21 - 27
Page: [1] [2]