Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+BV\/BY\s+vs\s+Crimea\:\s+apples\s+and\s+oranges\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+BV\/BY\s+vs\s+Crimea\:\s+apples\s+and\s+oranges\?\s*$/: 1 ]

Total 1 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] BV/BY vs Crimea: apples and oranges? (score: 1): Author: kr2q@optimum.net; Date: Sun, 19 Oct 2014 18:17:11 +0000 (GMT); BV is on the DXCC list. I don't think anyone would argue that a ham operating from BV using a BY callsign should not be counted as BY. And equally, an operation by a ham using a BV callsign from BY s; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2014-10/msg00158.html (6,627 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 1
Page: [1]