Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Band\s+edge\s+operating\s+\-\s+Previously\s+\"More\s+CQWW\s+SSBspot\s+analysis\"\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [CQ-Contest] Band edge operating - Previously "More CQWW SSBspot analysis" (score: 1)
Author: "Paul Cassel " <paul@ve3sy.com>
Date: Fri, 2 Nov 2007 21:27:30 -0400
The IARU receive a consensus of member countries in each IARU region and then issues a band"plan" Individual members such as the USA and Canada etc then create regulations to fit the band"plan". You
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-11/msg00075.html (10,685 bytes)

2. Re: [CQ-Contest] Band edge operating - Previously "More CQWW SSBspot analysis" (score: 1)
Author: Michael Keane K1MK <k1mk@alum.mit.edu>
Date: Sat, 03 Nov 2007 11:05:54 -0400
In this case, 14350 kHz is not just a good idea (or agreement), it's the law. :-) Law that is binding upon signatories (countries) via treaty obligation. The principle originates in Article 4 of the
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-11/msg00104.html (10,748 bytes)

3. Re: [CQ-Contest] Band edge operating - Previously "More CQWW SSBspot analysis" (score: 1)
Author: "Peter Voelpel" <df3kv@t-online.de>
Date: Sat, 3 Nov 2007 20:10:53 +0100
With our regulation emissions outsite a band must be a minimum of 40db down and bandwith must be limited to 2,7KHz. That means that less then 75mW above 14350KHz are just acceptable. To obtain that o
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-11/msg00110.html (11,872 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu