- 1. [CQ-Contest] Busted Packet Spot Analysis (score: 1)
- Author: "K7ZO (Scott Tuthill)" <k7zo@cableone.net>
- Date: Sun, 22 Apr 2007 08:56:00 -0600
- For those of you who have operated in a multi-op you know that chasing spots is an important way to add to your mult and QSO totals. You also know how frustrating it can be to chase down busted and e
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-04/msg00180.html (14,418 bytes)
- 2. Re: [CQ-Contest] Busted Packet Spot Analysis (score: 1)
- Author: Gerald Boutin <gboutin@infinichron.com>
- Date: Sun, 22 Apr 2007 15:01:04 -0600
- Scott, I also did a similar, although much less intensive, analysis than you did. You mentioned filtering on uniques only spotted once or twice. I was looking at it from a slightly different point of
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-04/msg00182.html (10,274 bytes)
- 3. Re: [CQ-Contest] Busted Packet Spot Analysis (score: 1)
- Author: "SGT Korey Chandler" <korey.chandler@us.army.mil>
- Date: Sun, 22 Apr 2007 19:03:12 -0400
- All this is pretty much a moot point if the operator would LISTEN before transmitting. The best computer filtering program in the world will not beat the human brain. I will not work a spot until I l
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-04/msg00183.html (7,230 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu