Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Busted\s+Q\'s\,\s+and\s+similar\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Busted\s+Q\'s\,\s+and\s+similar\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] Busted Q's, and similar (score: 1): Author: n5ul@wtaccess.com (Charles W. Shaw); Date: Thu May 6 19:25:30 1999; Scott, K9MA said: "I'll cast another vote in FAVOR of log checking. The important thing is that we all play by the same rules, and we know what they are." I agree with him and like the improvements i; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1999-05/msg00108.html (7,184 bytes)
2. [CQ-Contest] Busted Q's, and similar (score: 1): Author: n5ul@wtaccess.com (Charles W. Shaw); Date: Fri May 7 02:24:06 1999; Hello again; and George, thanks for pointing out that-- As one example: Sub-Rules 1, 2, and 6 say "may be", while Sub-Rules 3, 4, 5, and 7 say "will be". It seems to me that the writers intended that; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1999-05/msg00117.html (7,297 bytes)
3. [CQ-Contest] Busted Q's, and similar (score: 1): Author: n6tr@teleport.com (n6tr@teleport.com); Date: Fri May 7 09:35:13 1999; Humans are very much involved in the "final" say with respect to DQing an entry. As far as I know, there are no DQs in the SS. One or two stations had some interesting things in their log that were; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1999-05/msg00142.html (7,981 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]