Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Busted\s+spots\s+in\s+ARRL\s+CW\s*$/: 14 ]

Total 14 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] Busted spots in ARRL CW (score: 1)
Author: "Yuri" <ve3dz@rigexpert.net>
Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2011 23:30:04 -0500
I received quite negative reaction on my 3830 report. Before I go any further, I would like to know the opinion of the respected public on the following: 14020.9 5I3CC 19-Feb-2011 2340Z <VE7FKM> 1405
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-02/msg00299.html (8,864 bytes)

2. Re: [CQ-Contest] Busted spots in ARRL CW (score: 1)
Author: Zack Widup <w9sz.zack@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2011 08:26:25 -0600
Well, whoever "VE7KFM" was, he busted quite a few calls! 73, Zack W9SZ _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/ma
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-02/msg00309.html (10,377 bytes)

3. Re: [CQ-Contest] Busted spots in ARRL CW (score: 1)
Author: Juan Hidalgo EA8CAC <ea8cac@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2011 12:42:59 +0000
iīm not agree with all about 3830 post....but about VE7FKM it looks like a "rookie" CW decoder, almost callsing are "fakes"....but, why to use a false callsing to send spots ??? -- 73 de EA8CAC SKYPE
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-02/msg00310.html (10,633 bytes)

4. Re: [CQ-Contest] Busted spots in ARRL CW (score: 1)
Author: John Geiger <aa5jg@fidmail.com>
Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2011 11:38:41 -0600
I do have the chuckle at these spots. Busted calls like this do serve to penalize those who rely too much on the internet and never copy what is actually being sent, so maybe they are a good thing! 7
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-02/msg00313.html (12,122 bytes)

5. Re: [CQ-Contest] Busted spots in ARRL CW (score: 1)
Author: Gary McAdams <g.m.mcadams@comcast.net>
Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2011 10:04:41 -0800
This fellow did the same to his call that he was doing to the DX calls. Check VE7FKM. I think that will answer your questions 73 Gary _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailin
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-02/msg00314.html (8,130 bytes)

6. Re: [CQ-Contest] Busted spots in ARRL CW (score: 1)
Author: Jim Reisert AD1C <jjreisert@alum.mit.edu>
Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2011 10:28:48 -0700
The "correct" spotter call should have been VE7KFM. He and KZ8O have been having a running battle on 14.275 for years, neither one is a contester. I believe there is a 3-land station involved also. D
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-02/msg00315.html (8,755 bytes)

7. Re: [CQ-Contest] Busted spots in ARRL CW (score: 1)
Author: "Paul Mackanos - K2DB" <k2db@k2db.com>
Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2011 12:40:50 -0500
Yuri and others, Looks like someone spotted these to get everyone to move to the new spot so that the pile-up on the real station they wanted to work would drop off. or they are a very poor CW op, or
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-02/msg00316.html (11,853 bytes)

8. Re: [CQ-Contest] Busted spots in ARRL CW (score: 1)
Author: Zrinko Zibert <ve3zik@googlemail.com>
Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2011 18:50:38 +0100
Simple, probably to test who works NON ASS with cluster :D 73, Zik DK8ZZ, VE3ZIK, YT3ZZ _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-02/msg00317.html (8,145 bytes)

9. Re: [CQ-Contest] Busted spots in ARRL CW (score: 1)
Author: "N7mal" <n7mal@citlink.net>
Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2011 03:45:02 -0800
Yuri here is another piece of the puzzle that may or may not be helpful. Those spots from the VE7 originated in Scottsdale Arizona on Desert Inet........ 73 MAL N7MAL BULLHEAD CITY, AZ http://www.n7m
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-02/msg00322.html (10,288 bytes)

10. Re: [CQ-Contest] Busted spots in ARRL CW (score: 1)
Author: "Yuri" <ve3dz@rigexpert.net>
Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2011 07:18:07 -0500
Mal, we already know who the guy is. You would be very surprised to know the call, because it's quite well known Contester. The warning is about to be sent to him. Of course it had nothing to do with
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-02/msg00323.html (8,663 bytes)

11. Re: [CQ-Contest] Busted spots in ARRL CW (score: 1)
Author: Bill Tippett <btippett@alum.mit.edu>
Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2011 08:51:10 -0500
VE3DZ: public on the following: Looking at the callsigns carefully, it appears that Team RB4W was mis-spotting all potential competitors to create QRM and wasted time. What unbelievable efforts these
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-02/msg00331.html (8,424 bytes)

12. Re: [CQ-Contest] Busted spots in ARRL CW (score: 1)
Author: Mike Fatchett W0MU <w0mu@w0mu.com>
Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2011 17:41:22 -0700
All this for a plaque or piece of paper to hang on a wall. I wonder what lengths people would go to win a real prize. W0MU _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-C
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-02/msg00335.html (9,195 bytes)

13. Re: [CQ-Contest] Busted spots in ARRL CW (score: 1)
Author: "Yuri" <ve3dz@rigexpert.net>
Date: Sat, 26 Feb 2011 10:35:11 -0500
Oh yeah? Of course it was a "rookie" CW decoder, always changing only 1 letter in call and using fake call for spotting. And also it was dong this ... how should I put this...very selectively. I hope
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-02/msg00348.html (11,853 bytes)

14. Re: [CQ-Contest] Busted spots in ARRL CW (score: 1)
Author: Juan Hidalgo EA8CAC <ea8cac@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 26 Feb 2011 18:36:45 +0000
I wrote "it looks like...." not "it was....". If the spotter call will be a true the things will be a little bit different, but it isnīt. I have a lot of DUPES for this too, they spot me like ER8R an
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-02/msg00351.html (13,688 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu