- 21. [CQ-Contest] CAC Ruminations About ARRL DX Exchange (score: 1)
- Author: w2up@mindspring.com (Barry Kutner)
- Date: Thu Aug 26 13:01:35 1999
- Gerry - Obviously, I disagree. As someone else stated, I am not portable. I am at my fixed, permanent location. The FCC eliminated call areas. There is no such thing any more. The number in your call
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1999-08/msg00485.html (11,460 bytes)
- 22. [CQ-Contest] CAC Ruminations About ARRL DX Exchange (score: 1)
- Author: n3bb@mindspring.com (Jim George, N3BB)
- Date: Thu Aug 26 06:26:36 1999
- I agree 100% with the comments by W2UP. To penalize those with valid FCC call signs (in the same DXCC country) and add two characters onto their call in the ARRL DX Contest will be punitive. Drop tha
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1999-08/msg00486.html (10,062 bytes)
- 23. [CQ-Contest] CAC Ruminations About ARRL DX Exchange (score: 1)
- Author: k5zd@ma.ultranet.com (Randy Thompson)
- Date: Thu Aug 26 06:32:57 1999
- In the I-can-be-as-stupid-as-you category... If you require me to sign portable, I won't. But I will send my state as Texas (or even better, Mississippi) so that it will reflect my call sign. Want to
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1999-08/msg00488.html (9,007 bytes)
- 24. [CQ-Contest] CAC Ruminations About ARRL DX Exchange (score: 1)
- Author: k4sb@mindspring.com (K4SB)
- Date: Thu Aug 26 21:09:29 1999
- Do you know how complicated distance scoring could be...that 160 meter contest with grid squares is so complex you send in the Q's and the contest committee computes the score...and no paper logs all
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1999-08/msg00492.html (8,783 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu